Бесплатный фрагмент - Теchnology of cognition (research) of socio-economic оbjects, processes and factors

1. This monograph is devoted to the creation and application of a unique, dialectical technology of cognition (research) of the socio-economic activity of humanity (abbreviated as «PTCH»), the use of which makes it possible to accurately determine which currently used socio-economic objects, processes and factors are allowed to be used in the economy and social sphere of a modern state, and which ones are socio-economic objects, processes and factors are strictly forbidden to be applied in the economy and social sphere of a modern state. The use of the «PTCH» cognition technology allows us to really, and not in words, eliminate poverty, hunger, unemployment, crime, terrorism, fascism, stop the inevitable destruction of the negative, market economy and social sphere in all modern states, stop wars between modern, negative states, prevent a global socio-economic catastrophe and a third world war, nuclear a war between modern states for profit in the global market of raw materials, goods and services.

2. The purpose of creating this technology, as well as all my other research works in the field of economics, is to use the semantic content of this technology to influence the consciousness of people and thus try to stop the use of socio-economic chaos called «Negative, unfair, criminal, thievish, market economy». the use of which inevitably leads to a global, socio-economic catastrophe and to the third world war, a nuclear war, which is the end of a continuous, global, brutal, socio-economic war for profit between modern, negative states in the global market of raw materials, goods and services.

The semantic content of these monograph is written clearly and simply and may be of interest to all people who are interested in the problems of modern economics. Dear reader, please forgive me for my imperfect translation of this monograph from Russian to English.

V. Alekseev

From the author.

1. At present, modern people do not have an intelligent technology consisting of intelligent tools and methods of cognition, with the help of which it is possible to accurately determine which socio-economic objects (including people and communities, i.e. enterprises, organizations), processes and factors (including intellectual tools of cognition) are harmful (useless) for the economy and social sphere of a modern state. The purpose of this research is to create an intelligent technology of cognition (research), that is, to create intelligent tools and methods of cognition (research), the use of which will allow anyone to accurately determine what socio-economic objects (including people and communities, i.e. enterprises, organizations), processes and factors (including intellectual tools of cognition), which are useful (necessary), and which are harmful (useless) for the economy and social sphere of a modern state.

2. As always, the main goal that I pursue in carrying out my research in the field of economics and publishing them in the form of monographs is to try to stop the commission of socio-economic crimes by modern people, as well as to try to stop the consequences of the commission of socio-economic crimes, namely: to stop the continuous, global, socio-economic a war for profit, with the use of weapons and the army, between negative, modern states in the global market, raw materials, goods and services, since the continuation of this continuous, socio-economic war for profit inevitably leads to a global, socio-economic catastrophe and the death of modern humanity.

3. The semantic content of this research paper is written clearly and simply and is accessible to any reader, regardless of their age and level of education. Perhaps after reading the contents of this monograph, as well as the content of my other studies in the field of economics, the reader will question the need to apply a modern, unfair, criminal, thievish, market economy, which in fact is the usual socio-economic chaos, the use of which inevitably leads to the destruction of modern humanity.

V. Alekseev

1. Objects of this research work.

The objects of this research work are civil and military, socio-economic activities of modern people, which consists in creating and applying socio- economic objects, processes and factors, and therefore the objects of this research work are socio-economic objects, processes and factors.

2. The purpose of this research paper.

The purpose of this research work is to create intellectual tools and methods of positive, dialectical technology of cognition (research) of the socio — economic activity of humanity «PTCH» or, which is the same thing, to create intellectual tools and methods of positive technology of cognition (research) of socio-economic objects, processes and factors, the use of which will allow any person to accurately determine, which socio-economic objects (including people and communities, i.e. enterprises, organizations), processes and factors (including intellectual tools of cognition) are useful (necessary), and which are harmful (useless) for the economy and social sphere of a modern state.

Remark. To study the socio-economic objects, processes and factors created and applied by modern people in the economy and social sphere means to accurately establish their socio-economic, qualitative and quantitative characteristics and, based on knowledge of these socio-economic, qualitative and quantitative characteristics, to accurately determine which socio-economic objects, processes and factors are allowed to be applied in the economy and social sphere of a modern state, and which ones are strictly prohibited to apply in the economy and social sphere of a modern state. Thus, the positive, dialectical technology of cognition (research) of socio-economic objects, processes and factors «PTCH» is a vital socio-economic filter that the government of any modern state is obliged to apply if it is interested in creating and applying an effective economy and social sphere and if it is not interested in destroying its economy and social sphere. social sphere. The need for mandatory application of this socio-economic filter should be reflected in the content of the constitution of any modern state. The sooner the citizens who exist in modern states understand this, the better it will be for them, since the application of this socio-economic filter will dramatically increase the standard of living of all, without exception, citizens of a modern state, and not a limited number of people, as is currently the case. In this research paper, I study only socio-economic, qualitative characteristics of socio-economic objects, processes and factors that are used in the economy and social sphere of a modern state. Socio-economic, quantitative characteristics of socio-economic objects, that are used in the economy and social sphere of the modern state I will explore in my other monograph. I finish my comment.

3. Intellectual tools used in this research work.

The intellectual tools that I always use in my research work are positive dialectical terms, propositions, postulates (statements, laws), and theories that I create on my own.

Introduction

1. All citizens of any modern state strive to achieve their main socio-economic purposes. The main socio-economic purposes of the citizens of modern states are the creation and continuous accumulation of socio-economic capital and their transformation into people of socio-economic parasites.

Remark. You, the reader, will find out who the socio-economic parasites are later, from the contents of this monograph. I finish my comment.

2. Striving to achieve their main, socio-economic purposes, the citizens of the modern state consciously, purposefully and systematically create and apply theoretical and practical tools with which they expect to achieve their main, socio-economic purposes.

3. The theoretical tools with which the citizens of a modern state expect to achieve their main socio-economic purposes are many different economic and social theories, including those called: «The theory of Supply and Demand», «The Theory of Money», «The Theory of Profit»,» The Theory of the free market», «The theory of the free market». Theory of Continuous growth of the state economy», «Political Economy», «Economics», «People’s Economy», «Libertarian Economy», " Mixed Economy (public-private partnership)», «Behavioral Economy», «Social Economy», «Socialist Economy», «Communist Economy» and so on, and also, the constitution of the state and legal laws created by the state parliament.

4. Practical tools with which citizens of a modern state expect to achieve their main, socio-economic purposes are a variety of socio-economic objects, processes and factors created and applied by people, including those called: market economy and the social sphere of a modern state, economic tools called: arbitrary in size «cost of socio-economic capital (in the form of labour, raw materials, goods and services)», arbitrary units of measurement of the cost of socio-economic capital called" Money», including electronic money and cryptocurrency; the state parliament, the state government, the president and his administration, and other tools for managing the economy and social security. the sphere of the modern state, including the army, police, prosecutor’s office, courts, as well as various enterprises and organizations, including financial, insurance, joint-stock, as well as commodity and stock exchanges, stocks, bonds, and so on.

5. Since all citizens of a modern state are interested in achieving their main, socio-economic purposes, they inevitably have to ask themselves the following question: are the theoretical and practical tools created and used by people to achieve the main, socio-economic purposes“ useful „or «harmful» (useless)? That guarantees or does not guarantee the creation and application of the above-mentioned theoretical and practical tools for the implementation of their main socio-economic purposes. Therefore, the citizens of a modern state should ask themselves the second question, namely: with the help of what theoretical tools (criteria) it is possible to accurately determine whether the theoretical and practical tools created and used by people to achieve the main socio-economic purposes are «useful» (necessary) or «harmful»(useless). I can answer this question as follows, namely: at present, the citizens of a modern state do not have any theoretical tools (criteria) that can be used to accurately determine whether the theoretical and practical tools created and applied by people to achieve the main purposes are «useful» (necessary) or «harmful» (useless)., socio-economic purposes.

6. Since at present the citizens of the modern state do not have any theoretical tools (criteria) with the help of which it is possible to accurately determine whether the theoretical and practical tools created and applied by people for achieving the main socio-economic purposes are «useful» (necessary) or «harmful» (useless), I set myself the task of using dialectical tools to create theoretical tools (criteria) that can be used to accurately determine whether the theoretical and practical tools created and used by people to achieve the main socio-economic purposes are «useful» (necessary) or «harmful» (useless). The process of applying these theoretical tools (criteria), I called the method of critical dialectical analysis (abbreviated — «MCDA»). I have called the combination of theoretical tools (criteria) and the MCDA method the dialectical technology of cognition of socio-economic objects, processes and factors, or, which is the same thing, the positive dialectical technology of cognition of the socio-economic activity of humanity (abbreviated as «PTCH»). Why this dialectical technology of cognition is called positive, you, the reader, will find out later.

7. I’m starting to create this technology.

Positive, dialectical technology of cognition of socio-economic objects, processes and factors «PTCH».

1. In order to determine exactly which socio-economic objects, processes and factors, including (intellectual tools of cognition), created and applied by socio-economic people in the modern economy and social sphere, are useful (necessary) and which are harmful (useless), I must first establish which ones socio-economic and qualitative characteristics should include socio-economic objects, processes, and factors, including (intellectual tools of cognition) created and used by socio-economic people. Since at present people have not created the socio-economic, qualitative characteristics that socio-economic objects, processes and factors used in the modern economy and social sphere should have, I must create these socio-economic, qualitative characteristics myself.

2. The socio-economic characteristics of socio-economic objects, processes and factors created by me must meet strictly defined socio-economic criteria (requirements, conditions). Since currently people have not created socio-economic criteria (requirements, conditions) that must meet strictly defined, socio-economic, qualitative characteristics of socio-economic objects, processes, and factors, in this case I must create socio-economic criteria (requirements, conditions) myself. Then I must create a method of cognition (research) of socio-economic, qualitative characteristics that socio-economic objects, processes and factors used in the modern economy and social sphere.This means that I must create a process in which, by applying the socio-economic criteria (requirements, conditions) that I have created, I can accurately determine the specific socio-economic and qualitative characteristics of the socio-economic objects, processes, and factors used in the modern economy and social sphere.

.2. I will start performing these three tasks.

2.1. In order to accurately distinguish between all socio-economic objects, processes and factors created and applied in the modern economy and social sphere, I must create their socio-economic, qualitative characteristics.

2.2. In order to create the socio-economic, qualitative characteristics that socio-economic objects processes and factors created and applied in the modern economy and social sphere should have, I divided them into two main groups, one of which I called positive, socio-economic, qualitative characteristics of socio-economic objects processes I named the other group of characteristics as negative, socio-economic qualitative characteristics of socio-economic objects, processes, and factors. In this way, I have created two main socio-economic qualitative characteristics, using which it is possible to distinguish between all socio-economic objects, processes and factors created and applied in the modern economy and social sphere.

2.3. While studying socio-economic characteristics, I have established that positive, socio-economic qualitative characteristics of socio-economic objects, processes, and factors should be scientifically organized, scientifically based, scientifically necessary, socio-economic qualitative characteristics. Then I established that negative, socio-economic qualitative characteristics of socio-economic objects, processes, and factors should be not scientifically organized, not scientifically based, not scientifically necessary, and socio-economic qualitative characteristics. Thus, I have created six auxiliary, socio-economic qualitative characteristics that can be used to distinguish between all socio-economic objects, processes, and factors created and applied in the modern economy and social sphere.

2.4. Then I determined what socio-economic criteria (requirements, conditions) should be met by socio-economic objects, processes, and factors in order to have strictly defined, auxiliary, socio-economic qualitative characteristics.