Nowadays it is fashionable to “practice trying to control reality”, but few people are able to even approximately explain and answer the question: What is “Reality”? For this reason, the result of the practices turns out to be practically zero — since the practitioners have no idea in what conditions they are trying to act, with the intention of influencing the basis for the realization of things and the formation of situations. It is available, but the skill will require a lot of knowledge. At the same time, both the practice itself and the results will be perceived by other, ignorant people as “Magic”;

Science. Is it possible to study something you don’t know about? And, as it turned out, something works, but — looking at the result, we are not able to identify it and qualify it adequately, as well as what we worked on and how we did it. And this because we act in unknown conditions. We know practically nothing about the “Structure of the World’ and, accordingly, we do not understand, What this, the World?

It turns out that we know nothing about Ourselves, nor about the World we live in, nor about Reality, and we try to control all of this. In this statement of fact, of course, there is “no hopelessness’, and on the contrary — there is certainty and interest in life, a desire for development, an intention to study and know. Although, in a nutshell, the essence is most often in the attitude to what is in itself, i.e. we will have to adapt — this is the attitude to the Surrounding Dangerous World | or, to the fact that everything in the World exists for us, and we should simply use it for its intended purpose and Develop by gaining experience, then any danger is perceived as a delusion of reason, that is, as an ordinary task that will have to be solved in order to save life, or — lose relevance;

PURPOSE

We are sincerely glad to meet people interested in development, studying sciences, striving to “Know Thyself"*. Some consider this to be the most important task. But, those interested fail to define the questions that lay the foundation for such research. We believe that setting research goals can begin with an analysis of the “Act of Self-Credibility of the “I”” — according to the method of Rene Descartes “I think, therefore I am"**. This is the most famous of the universal keys to the beginning of knowledge. There are other ways, through asking questions:

How is the World structured? What is “I”? and, What is the meaning of life?

It is well known that many great minds have tried to answer these complex questions over the millennia. Almost every one of those learned thinkers formulated intricate postulates and wrote complex treatises to explain the Laws of Being — naturally embracing the horizons of metaphysics. But, through experience, philosophical thought developed together with civilization, culture and science, the number of tricky questions grew rapidly — and the ability to think in general changed. Humanity learned to philosophize, moving along a complex, very thorny path. Epoch after Epoch, this work became more complicated, but people managed to “drill deeper and deeper’. There will be no end to research. This is wonderful, because it is philosophy that teaches thinking and logical techniques. But, especially, metaphysics — contributes to the development of all sciences, and serves as a method of reorganizing the mind — opening up opportunities for finding new Ideas, activating lively insight, cultivating ingenuity, and unusual sharpness of mind;

Our questions will remain the same. We do not plan to set particularly ambitious and impossible tasks, but we will try to at least one step, the slightest bit, advance in the already existing (but frozen) studies, of all generations without exception. An important task will be to define our desire for simplicity of presentation, focusing on the most ordinary reader — a lover of fiction, interested in answers to the questions posed here. In our reasoning we will be stubborn, will use the method of <tedious> multiple repetitions, but always in other words, perhaps we will try to use a view from the outside, or from different points of view, perhaps we will offer an abstract idea, a tautology, or chaos, with the conviction that this will contribute to understanding;

This is real research.

Therefore, to expand the scope of the current thought, sometimes it will be necessary to jump from one topic to another, because they are closely related. It should be noted that we do not intend to arrogantly contradict and argue with anyone. We will not criticize the scientists of the past — we will show them Respect, and express sincere Gratitude, for their invaluable contribution to the development of Philosophical thought and the prosperity of humanity. So, we define the main Goals as — to get answers to the following questions:

How is the World structured? What is “I”? and, What is the meaning of life?

We will be grateful if at least something previously unknown is revealed to us — new, interesting, or useful;

* (Ancient Greek: Γνῶθι σεαυτόν, “Know Thyself” inscription on the wall in the temple of Apollo in Delphi, in the 6th century BC it was already popular);

** (lat. Cogito ergo sum, “I think, therefore I am”, R. Descartes, “Discourse on Method”, 1637);

Being in a completely dark room, we are able to touch objects, hear sounds and feel smells, temperature, air movement, water flow, … In addition, we can think, breathe and move, but this does not give us such a complete idea of the World as we have with the help of sight. Nevertheless, we can draw a conclusion about the relativity of tangible objects, imagine their shapes, judge the difference in size, the difference in strength, hardness, roughness, and other parameters. Without sight, we would probably be able to create a tactile picture limited by distance, or even a map, but — being blind from birth, and without the experience of sighted people — we would not have the opportunity to think about the stars and planets and would hardly reason about the infinity of the Universe. Without using sight, and without the experience of contemplation, it is extremely difficult, and probably impossible, to construct an adequate picture of the structure of the World. And even now, thanks to sight, we know exactly where to begin this study:

CONTEMPLATED

Long time ago, man decided to choose for himself an Idea, which turned into a stereotype, that what is contemplated is outside. This position is simple and quite understandable. It seems to us easier to explain — why they decided this way and not otherwise. Some researchers in this audience are convinced of the correctness of the materialistic (physical) model of the World, and the other part, on the contrary, have “certain’ idealistic ideas. In any case, there are many contradictory positions, which have no evidence, brought to the “status of indisputable truth’ by authoritative, but unsubstantiated statements based on subjective choice. This concerns the most important, fundamental questions. We propose to understand together, in the process of research;

Compared to hearing, taste, smell, touch — vision is the most informative instrument of “Reality Perception’. Technically, the principle of operation of all sense organs is the same: impact on receptors (i.e. data receipt) -> signal to the brain -> signal processing, i.e. Interpretation* and Perception of the result; Obviously, the effectiveness of visual perception significantly exceeds the sense of smell, for example. We do not smell the subtle scent of objects at a great distance, we cannot distinguish more than ten smells at the same time, but we see much further than we smell — widely and high, with the transmission of colors and the dynamics of thousands of objects in this grandiose picture of the frame of reality, so we think it is rational to begin the study with questions:

How does the mechanism of contemplation work?

How does it happen?

We will not study the obvious, therefore we propose to immediately accept it as an axiom: We see all objects according to one principle. That is, stars, sky, trees, and own body — all visible objects are contemplated by us technically in the same way, by means of one instrument — “vision”; We suggest that we first discuss the terms needed here — clarify and accept their brief meanings:

Reason — is an individual instrument of the “I”, which ensures work with data and experience, analysis, and conclusions. The importance of reason cannot be overestimated in any way — without the use of reason, the “Act of self-certainty of the ‘I’” will be absolutely impossible, since it requires analysis (I think) and conclusions (Therefore, I exist). Reason does not make decisions, this instrument cannot be considered independently active. We will discuss this later;

Obviously, it follows from this that the “I” itself, without reason, is an unconscious wave function, but — and in that case, we would not be aware of vital activity and the manifestation of the ability to express will;

Besides this, the question arises: In relation to What? Firstly (and in any case), the necessity of the basic relativity of being is determined itself, i.e. in general — to the static, passive opposite, in relation (comparison), or in direct integration, with which the “I” has the opportunity to manifest the activity inherent to “It”. Let’s say — “Consciousness”. Secondly, we have a self-evident conclusion about the multiplicity of various “other I’s?”, which (from the position of each) are not my “I”, i.e. those others who are “Not I”. We will also discuss questions concerning this later;

* * *

Mind — is a developing means of Reason and a set of methods — individual methods of using the capabilities of the mind, building special thinking functions using experience (including sensory and mental) and logical conclusions. The mind itself does not decide anything — any decisions are made by the “I” (literally “From Above”), however, the Mind controls the category of criteria, operates with properties and methods. Here is an example of choice: multiply one hundred by three, or — to three, 99 times add three. You can have hundreds of separate methods and techniques, or combine them into one very effective tool — “Mind”;

Intelligence — is the property of special living beings to develop rationally and effectively, through the use of reason and the application of the mind. Intelligence, beings are capable of expressing desire, showing will and intention, thinking and studying, creating, creating, loving and rejoicing, having culture — speaking, dancing, singing, joking… “Capable within the Universe’, have a potentially infinite number of conceivable and inconceivable properties. However, depending on the level of development, or even mental state, they can have a number of special characteristics, among which (let’s smile): they, for some “appropriate reason”, or for no reason at all :), can be sociable, hospitable and friendly, and on the contrary — aggressive, insidious and very dangerous, or is this subjective and “we think so because we ourselves are like that”?

* * *

Among people (and not only :)), there is a statement that “the brain sees surrounding objects’. However, it is clear to us that there is only one most important Element that states all the results, which feels directly, and “sees in fact’ — in the final instance, and as a result of all systemic iterations (of reason). The Main Element! — endowed with Life, desiring, manifesting intention, feeling, recognizing the process as completed. It is precisely this Element that is That which we call “I” — it is precisely That which we consider “Ourselves” — in all cases when we say “I”, whether to ourselves or to someone else, and also when we think: “I” — meaning by this “Myself”, in the direct sense, and in Our Person;

Treat repetitions with understanding — it is necessary to convey the meaning to Yourself first of all, and then, equally correctly to everyone — capable of understanding, realizing, and never confusing the “I”, that is, “Yourself”, with your own body, which is an important “thing”, this is of course, but it is precisely the representation of a specific “I” in the conditions of reality (and in the appropriate form), for the possibility of participating in situations (and gaining experience);

* * *

So, continue the research:

Let us consider the mechanism of current contemplation, that is, at the present moment in time, as at any moment, but right now; It should be noted that we do not consider mental visions, in a dream, in delirium, under hypnosis, since the mechanism of contemplation is fundamentally the same, if we often confuse the vision of active reality in those states | with obvious factual reality;

We will base our reasoning on the most popular, materialistic position — this will be accessible and understandable for most people [this is here and now]:

1. Photons emitted by any light source are reflected from the object and affect the retinal cell of the eye;

2. A retinal cell initiates an electrical signal to the brain;

3. The signal is processed by using a handler (our Reason);

4. “I” contemplate the object as a result of processing. We say — “I see” — this is the moment of current contemplation;

The content of the contemplated result of processing must be interpreted — taking into account the existing experience of the “I”. We see before we understand — “What exactly do we see?” Then what we know very well happens — these are internal processes: comparisons, thinking, analysis, mental, and others — they are performed by means of Reason. Any experience, as a subjective conclusion of the “I”, is also formed by Reason. The situation is remembered as a whole, stored in memory as information, not being an experience;

The experience that is extracted is only new {relationships, knowledge, objects, feelings, sensations, emotions, forms, thoughts, thought forms, situations, situation patterns};

That is, it can be argued that any situation is only a potential experience, just as it can be argued that there are no “empty details” that do not contain any meaning, and from each of them, with due attention and analysis, one can extract experience, be it any object (also its dynamics and changes), or part of the situation, or the situation as a whole;

The moment of realization* of reality always corresponds to the point of concentration — this is the point of current attention. The quality of realization at this point is the highest — interpretation provides the necessary conditions for precise qualification, clarity of understanding, detailing of properties and forms from those available in experience, corresponding to individual capabilities, and namely: “Potential of Reason’, which uses unique methods and functions, that is, subjective, and subject to special psychic relationships and influences of the superstructure. It should be noted that the quality of other, lateral objects is lower than at the point of concentration. On the periphery, what is contemplated is significantly blurred, the clarity of the boundaries of objects is almost absent, they seem to float, compared to the clarity and specificity at the point of concentration. The colors of objects on the periphery are distorted to approximate, with shades of gray. The quality of interpretation? of peripheral objects, their situational meanings, as well as the general semantic content, is inferior to those in the center of attention. The general picture of contemplation is that the Content of the so-called “Frame of Reality” looks like a aureole, with highest quality in the center and a gradual decrease as you move away from the center to the sides (Resembling a “pipe”, which is very important — it is necessary to keep this oddity in mind);

The mechanism and processes of contemplating separate objects work asynchronously — for example, if three or four different objects suddenly appear in our field of vision at the same time, then their precise and detailed interpretation, and then “identification’ occurs sequentially, and so on — when the point of concentration moves. However, objects not located at the point of concentration will be interpreted simultaneously, albeit preliminary and roughly, but this happens quickly, in parallel and asynchronously. For some time, albeit a very short time, we unable to establish “what kind of objects these are?”;

The time required to establish clarity is different for each object. Depending on the content — some objects are interpreted almost instantly, while others literally manifest themselves, slowly filling with essence, definition, the necessary semantic clarity;

Also, “forgotten” objects are interpreted slowly, which are realized, i.e. contemplated and required for use very rarely, or extremely changed to the level of “difficult to recognize.” For example, it is difficult to identify a person whom you have not met for 30—40 years or more, and then encountered him “face to face”;

*Realization — as a still moment, implies a “frame of reality” (similar to a screenshot from a monitor screen), that is, a recorded situation, in the form of a contemplated picture. But, the realization observed “in the process” — is literally a phenomenon reflecting the transformation of existing experience into new experience. If we look at the process from the “Global Position”, then this happens only for the purpose of developing the “Entity” by acquiring new experience — mental, psychic, or any other, but necessarily new, and more rational and effective. The situations being realized are multi-component, but do not contain useless details. By analyzing each object and any situation, one can endlessly extract new experience;

Let us also take into account that with a lack of light, the quality of the situation (reality frame) is reduced and, in complete darkness, the image disappears completely. With eyes closed, being in the dark, a person does not see anything with the naked eye, i.e. in a normal state. Interpretation of objects, in low light, will be slow as with a lack of data, or with a limitation of the “channel width’. In late twilight, the time for recognizing objects increases, and we often encounter this incident: “look closer’ :);

To have a complete picture it is necessary to study in detail the mechanism of contemplation. The eye is an instrument similar to an optical device with “sensor cells” capable of responding to photons, but are they external? <objects, and photons>.

The cone cells of the eye, “when exposed to photons’, send corresponding electrical signals to the brain. Then, the signals are processed and the result of the processing is realized in a real picture, and simultaneously contemplated, after which we say “I” see. Focusing our vision on the point of concentration — “I” clearly see a specific object, and vaguely see the rest, the surrounding;

This is important: Pay special attention to the moment of impact of photons on the eye cell — at this moment photons cross the boundary of the body, and then everything that happens is implied by internal processes (first and initially we think like this: signals do not fly back, everything happens inside). The body is realized in the idea of “I Am — here, and this is how I look.” Look in the mirror — this is how you realize yourself, or to be more precise — “I” realizes itself in accordance with the existing experience. After crossing the body boundary, through the eyes and cone cells, the signals enter the brain, where they are processed and the “I” sees what is being contemplated. That is, it is You who now see what you previously considered independent of Consciousness*, and namely — external. Look around and look around — this is what is being contemplated now. This moment is extremely important in our research. Concentrate and analyze how this transition “inside the Self” occurs (and, does it occur?);

For a sure understanding, try again and again to recognize This “I” in reasoning — “Your Own Self”. When we reason about “I”, then each one should mean “Himself”. We can especially concentrate and also assume the “I” of each person, both from our own and from his position, abstractly, perceiving the picture from the outside, being an observer;

In the structure of the mechanism of contemplation, everything is very clear and there is nothing new. Science confirms the same, and today it is an objective scheme. But, the “angle” from which this scheme must be looked at has a special significance (we will try to look at it completely differently);

*Consciousness (in this study) — has a different meaning than the usual, generally accepted in philosophy, science, and modern literature. In the process of studying, we will move together to explain this concept, for an adequate understanding of the essence;

So, we will try look at it in a completely different way — in a new way. We propose to simplify the “Contemplation Mechanism Scheme” to the limit: Photons are reflected from objects, affecting the cells of the retina. The cells initiate signals and send them to the brain. After which these signals are processed and then we state “I see”. Study carefully and imagine this scheme as vividly as possible. The mechanism of contemplation is trivial and having realized it, we will be able to move to another level. Having delved into the reasoning, we will have to concentrate and be more attentive;

The signal handler (see fig. 1) irresistibly isolates and separates the elements in this reasoning:

object -> [f-cell-e] -> handler -> contemplated

The [f-cell-e] + handler (photon-cell-electron + handler) block — irresistibly and irreversibly separates external objects from internal processes, that is, we contemplate inside without the possibility of looking outside. In addition, the “handler” reliably destroys the previous format (…if it existed), converting it in some way unknown to us into what we call the contemplated — the visible, which cannot be outside;

We understand the essence of the insurmountability of systemic barriers and the irreversibility of processes, and we understand that we cannot see anything “external” directly, but how then do we “manage” to think about the external, being in conditions of complete isolation? Many researchers in this audience are absolutely sure that using the eyes, external objects are transmitted (!) to the brain by means of photons, and we see them inside, but contemplated and “physical”, they are definitely outside, … they think exactly this way and even say that “we do not see the objects themselves” — implying their existence as independent and external (this retro-conception is very familiar to us);

Knowing the structure, this is “nonsense’, although the main problem is precisely that the simplest thing turns out to be extremely difficult to understand, so only methodical repetition and periodic return to this structure will help us, that is, explaining it in other (and different) words, and looking from different positions. Let us take into account that it is not only the handler that turns out to be an obstacle, but there are also other obstacles, for example photons — they act only as a carrier of information, and are not the contemplated object itself (and only for now this is exactly the case); the eye cell receives photons, but sends an electrical signal to the brain processor (handler); we especially note that — the result of processing is not contemplated, in the conscious sense;

Contemplation of images (“things’, objects, and situations) is a psychic phenomenon inherent in the alive “Entity”;

You may substitute the term “Entity” for “Monad” or “Soul” — especially when it comes to the activity of the “I” in the conditions of reality, but we will deliberately refrain in order to avoid misinterpretations (we will soon study this concept) — do not rush to call the cup the “Grail’;

Of course, we understand very well that this is happening to us right now and, looking at the diagram, we can clearly imagine how: “I” is in a kind of spacious internal bubble, i.e. “I Myself’ (from the position of each of us, now), as if bathing in reality;

Here & now, all of us, being in this audience, and in these very conditions of complete isolation from the supposed “external” — are discussing the structure of the contemplation mechanism, and we say: “The photon wave is reflected from the object and so on’, however, we are already being and discussing in these very conditions. And again, look around, we were originally here and at the beginning of the discussion;

Understanding practice (the task to be solved): Most often, the correct perception of the mechanism of contemplation must be controlled, otherwise it will end up on the list of incomprehensibles. The thing is that — a person does not apply the conclusions to what he is reasoning about. In this case — we talking about the mechanism of contemplation, not abstractly, but directly about how we see the environment and the situation, just right now. Then — we make a conclusion, but — we are unable to apply this result (conclusion) to what we were originally reasoning about. Please note the output used:

1. We are here (in the same room);

2. We begin to reason;

3. A photon is reflected from an object;

4. It affects an eye cell;

5. The cell initiates a signal to the brain;

6. The brain processes the signal;

7. “I” sees the result of the processing;

8. Everything that happened up to this point was not clear to us until we figured it out, that is, we cannot see the electrons themselves — they must be processed, transforming into ephemeral images;

9. Among other things — images cannot be understood until they are identified and realized.

Please note — we begin the reasoning not in order to separate it from the situation, but on the contrary — we are investigating perception of the situation, the mechanism of contemplation of objects works, now, in the current mode. In connection with this study, we found out that we see inside the “Consciousness’ — “I” sees this as a result of processing. So: we’ve a conclusion. It remains to understand that this conclusion cannot be separated from what we see now. We began to reason under one set of conditions and assumed that everything is outside, but it turned out that it is inside;

In the process of research we have found out that “we are inside Consciousness’ — we were here before. If we suddenly refuse to accept this reality — allow ourselves to deny the established fact, discarding <these ideal> conditions and begin to assert the opposite, then — following scientific, physical principles, we will again prove that we are in isolated space.

From all this follows the accompanying conclusion:

“Materialism is outliving itself at the systemic level” — although, this is not very useful knowledge, since perhaps we would not have found the “True Path’, than starting the reasoning from the materialistic position, or in other words — everything has a basis, including who we are now (there is no negative experience) and, among other things, we take into account that — “Everything Has Its Time”;

Let us also assume another — “reverse position’. Let us assume that initially we have such a Scheme of Nature: “We are in an isolated bubble — inside Consciousness, and have always known, and now know only about this.” Now look around, turn on awareness, then imagine everything. And? Is it reasonable to assume that the “World We Contemplate’ has a “Real Original’ located somewhere out there, outside, and even in some unknown to us, and absurd — “physical form’? Imagine as best you can, periodically practice imagining this device “supposed” by us. The result of this exercise may surprise you. If you are very attentive, you will soon smile from the funny — the wild Ancient Stereotype that has dominated Humanity since the Beginning of Time, and we are under Its influence;

It is known that any objects are contemplated according to the same principle. We are able not only to see, but also to identify, qualify, evaluate objects, to realize volume, color, mutual relativity, other parameters: size, distance, dynamics…

Thus, we “understand objects as located’, in space and occupying part of the volume. In addition, we note, judging by the conclusions, the main tools: identification, qualification, and analysis, of contemplated objects and situations, are used in thought processes, and provide comparison (matching).

These tools can be assumed to be separate from Reason, and quite independent, as we distinguish “Mind’, as a kind of mathematical co-processor, but they can also be built-in, i.e. formed, functions. This does not change anything fundamentally, does not affect anything, does not return us to the previous worldview;

Let us emphasize the possibility of developing all functions. Example: If similar but different quality objects often “appear’ in the field of vision, then their processing (i.e. identification and qualification), as specific experience is extracted, will be carried out, each time — faster and more accurately. This is how people learn to work on a sorting conveyor, achieve heights in this matter, and become “Narrow Specialists’;

We constantly use an amazing tool, and call it the “Interpreter’. Does it even exist?, or is it a normal function of Reason — acquired, like all the others? In discussing the mechanism of contemplation, you noticed that photons are converted by the eye cell into electrons — this is an extremely important point in the study, since objects are affected and used by conditions corresponding to the situation.

So, photons cannot be processed because they are “objects themselves’ — the wave of data related to the Nature of “Consciousness and Entity’ in their fundamental relativity. We suggest you take your time, examine all in order to sturdy and know it later. Next, we need to consider the Concept of Entity;

ENTITY

The Entity (here) is a logically defined, unique alive Monad, capable of manifesting a special intention — Actively Developing, as well as contributing to the Development of Its independent manifestations, which have their Own Will, are conceptually dependent and inseparable from It. The Monad (here) — we mean a completely ordinary concept, that is, it is the “Primary Being”, a Special Life Unit, Giving Origin to all living beings in the World (“multisoul’);

Usually <in layman’s thinks>, we often equate the concept of “Entity” with the concept of “Property <of character>" (mean something like “Essence’), or a complex of certain parameters (of a specific living being). Here, however, we put much more into the concept than can be expressed in words, and then we synthesize several concepts into one, combining them all:

{“God’+“Soul’+“Development’+“Life’+“World’+“Truth’}

There is also something more that we would like to say, but we cannot, running ahead of the content of research and reasoning, form an erroneous opinion, or, even more so, cause you to have an unpleasant “Hindsight Error” (pseudo phenomenon: “I knew it”, or “I already knew it”). Since in the state of cognition, you (together with us) will make a number of discoveries yourselves, which may turn out to be extremely interesting and useful. As a result, your Bright Ideas, born thanks to the knowledge acquired in this audience, will serve humanity in other sciences. However, the main thing that can happen is that you will find the answers to the questions posed (and specifically your questions), since this is what brought you here, and you will learn everything else in the process of research. –So, what awaits us in the end? … –Eternal Peace;

At this stage* of research, it is important to understand the isolated space, which is not limited and includes: The Whole World as a whole — all the conditions of actual infinity that we can imagine, the Universe, and us, and all living beings. But we are also able to understand that we realize only that which we contemplate, which we see “here and now”. Everything else, “around the corner”, i.e. Everything that we do not see at this moment — also exist, but only as a complex wave function. If you imagine everything except the function differently — it is worth staying, understanding in more detail, imagining each step in detail, and with the wave and the wave function — you will fully understand later, … in the process;

Look around again — feel “Consciousness” and this infinite sphere of your space in all directions; Reason consistently, and be sure to be unbiased (like it or not, study all the material for an adequate judgment). If you do not understand — read the research again. We suggest reasoning about “Consciousness” and everything connected with It (“we hope to dispel the shadow of many doubts’);

* * *

* By the end of this book, the attitude to the “subjects” of the research that we are considering here, as well as the attitude to the topic itself, especially to the set Goals, will change beyond recognition for everyone in this audience, because it is impossible to “recognize the unfamiliar’, something you have not encountered, but if cognition happens, it will be forever and irreversibly. We will begin to think (reflect) differently, and this is inevitable, therefore, if you do not want to change your attitude to your reality, or consider it threateningly dangerous, do not continue reading — close the book. Or, your mind will transform and form functions that are currently incomprehensible to you, and it will be absolutely impossible (!) to get rid of them after they have already been formed;

CONSCIOUSNESS

We are accustomed to judge about “It’ rather peculiarly, and always implied “Consciousness” by what was considered the internal functional activity of the brain — the processes occurring in it, sensory, psychic, but chemical in their physical nature. Many inquisitive people suspect that this is not quite as it was considered, and not very easy to understand due to its unusualness. But the Truth, which is already known, will not change from our attitude to It, and will not bend to individual oddities of character;

Fundamental laws do not care whether we know about them or not. But are not indifferent for us. We want to explore the World, study Ourselves, and study sciences, to develop in order to know! To look openly, to breathe freely, and to live with dignity of a Human — having thrown off the rusty shackles of senile remnants and stereotypes. Otherwise, for a long time we will not be able to understand — What are We really capable of?

For the realization of volumetric (“3D”) objects, a corresponding space (i.e. place) is necessary, otherwise it cannot be realized… even in the virtual World; Let us assume that “Consciousness” provides for the “I” the realization of three-dimensional space and objects located in its volume. Why exactly does “Consciousness” provide the realization of space? And why is this realized “for I”, and not just like that — without reason?

Let us first answer the second question: We have not yet tried to prove the presence of other people in the “Isolated Area of Consciousness”, and it is unlikely to be very simple, because space is realized individually (- complete isolation). We will study this a little later, but at this stage we can only assert that Objects and space are realized only for a <one> specific “I”;

About of the first question, regarding the source of realization, it should be taken into account that the “I” is active and cannot be passive, that is, in relation to “Consciousness”, the “I” has opposite properties, otherwise it would contradict the balance of the necessary relativity of the being of the “I”.

As a result of what is known, “Consciousness” is static. We recognize only “I” and “Consciousness” as primary, this means that the active “I” initiates the realization of objects and space through “Consciousness”, that is, it uses “Its” functional capabilities. With its intention, “I” leads “Consciousness” to “Active Realization”. All this is too simple, however, when we get confused, we encounter difficulties that we ourselves have invented, but without any basis. Everyone knows that many people elevate the realization of reality to a supernatural creation (magic, sorcery), but everything has an explanation, logic and basis — Everything happens due to development, i.e. natural rational change — through the acquisition of experience of the active “I”, or when applying the experience that is already there, but with the same purpose — Development;

The same becomes known in connection with life practice — the “I” is active and uses any available tools, and is interested in development — shows interest in “things” and situations. This is not an unfounded statement — when studying the “I”, we take into account obvious facts, that is, our own properties and characteristics. When knowing Ourselves, it is necessary to identify the “I” being studied = Ourselves (I Am). We know that in order to carry out the Act of self-authenticity, the “I” uses reason, but Reason becomes available when the “I” influences Consciousness, and Is the Product of this relativity;

There are also very important facts and conclusions related to the development of Reason and its functions, but now this is not the time, we will definitely return to this later;

Any Being has relativity, which can be spatial — when the “interdependent arrangement of objects relative to each other’ is implied and used, but relativity can also be inherent — ensuring the “Harmony of the World’ in maintaining the Balance of Opposites, that is, what we usually call the Internal Energy Balance. Also in the properties of elemental compounds, and in the essence of important astrophysical Laws — the violation of this Balance is “strictly unacceptable’;

* * *

It is probably sometimes useful and necessary to look ahead, to grasp the “still unfamiliar’, for the subsequent realization of a more “Prepared and Justified Reality’. When the topic is extremely complex, all the contributing methods and opportunities should be used for better understanding, especially if it concerns worldview convictions and/or involves contradictions to persistent stereotypes;

For proper preparation, we will give the usual relations: Cold/Hot, Near/Far, +/-, Heavy/Light, Reasonable/Unreasonable, and concerning our reasoning, the very important Fundamental relation [“I” | “Consciousness”].

For a complete and deep awareness, the actual, that is, the “Full Being of the ‘I’”, we recommend that you study, realize, and take into account the following most important relations:

[“Abstract Being of the Global ‘I’”, and |

“Being of the Global ‘I’ in the Conditions of Reality”];

Although is not yet timely, it is necessary to keep in mind:

— We represent the “I” abstractly, i.e. the “One I” literally the General, which is each individual “Real aspect of the Entity” in reality — that is, it is present as the “Global aspect of the I” — nowhere specifically everywhere at the same time (It Is).

As an abstract — “One Self (“I”)” is absolutely static and therefore is inherent in a wave nature, however, “Global aspect of the Entity” = “One Self (“I”)”, or = “Global aspect of the Self (“I”)”, necessarily has a balance — a Systemic opposite “Real aspect of the Global Self (“I”)” — One and unique Only Fundamental Systemically Necessary Alive Being in the World, having access to the entire volume of experience and data. “The Global Aspect of the Entity in Reality” — He! Has unlimited possibilities — a potential equal to the sum of the potentials of all living beings in the World. Equivalent of the entire World. He, Incomprehensible. Eternal;

— We also imagine the “I” in reality — as the usual, familiar to us — “I” in the body”, active, independent, manifesting will and intention, comprehending experience, that is, a living being in a body inherent to the nature of particles, and being in the conditions of reality. The “I” itself is the “Spark of Life”, that is, an infinitely small part of the Soul <“One I”> — “Global aspect of the Entity”. But, each “Real aspect of the Entity”, from the position of the “Real aspect of the Global I”, is defined as “Not I” (– which, however, is quite natural);

The duality of the “I” is confirmed by the Corpuscular-Wave Dualism, and indicates Its connection with any dimensions. It is important that the Nature of particles is Reality, and in the absence of <living> dynamics — a Static Wave (all this is very important further, we will return to this more than once);

Considering the fact of contemplating mental images that are not located in the “Space with Explicit Realization”, we can assert that the current “Explicit Space” is not the only one. Objects contemplated mentally, as if “once again inside’ <for example, extracted from memory> — also three-dimensional, and are also located in space, but in some other one. However, in any case, we realize and “realize Ourselves’ in the “frame of explicit current reality”, and precisely in such conditions in which the use of Reason is possible — thinking, observation, analysis of the situation, we will include in the list meditative states, astral space, the state of sleep, hypnotic conditions, etc.

All this confirms our conclusion that it is “Consciousness’ that realizes a potentially unlimited number of necessary spaces — for the specific needs of the “I”, in this case for the realization of three-dimensional objects, but we do not doubt our ability to extract experience using higher-order dimensions (– any degree of dimensionality, if this turns out to be available). However, now we assert only the most obvious fact:

Space is not “Consciousness”;

This is a very important (for us) postulate, it will be useful not only in this study, but also in the life of someone who likes life :). Formulations and short theses that have a special meaning move us towards answers to the questions posed here; Considering that we can close our eyes — refusing to contemplate the situation, or deliberately fall asleep, of our own free will — ceasing the realization of reality, the question arises: Can the “I” be Self-sufficient?

A positive answer to this question, in the ideal conditions of existence established by us, would indicate the complete irrelevance of the “I”, which contradicts everything absolutely, that is, it is illogical and impossible, for a number of natural reasons. However, if “Any ideas, feelings, thoughts, data of memory, and anything contemplated, can exist exclusively in ‘Consciousness’, in the form which we consider actual and valid, then irrelevance implies the ‘One ‘I’’, and not in some Emptiness of the World, but namely as ‘There is only ‘I’’, including everything conceivable and inconceivable, together with Emptiness, if we admit that It is possible at all”. This means that “Consciousness” is inside the “I”, but has a direct relativity to the “I”. Also, in particular, that is — from the position of each living being in the World — this is so — taking into account all the facts about which we reasoned before;

Can it be proven that this is not so? (by disproving Solipsism)

We have found out before, we know, and have already said it many times, that we see everything we contemplate only in “Consciousness” (“I” see in Consciousness) and from the current position, “Consciousness”, as the Cause (processor, mean handler?), is around, and precisely outside. When “Consciousness” is around — this means that “I” is in the center of the current space (“within the frame”), extracts experience acting in its own body in the conditions of reality, represents Itself in this form (body);

Consciousness inside means what we point to when we discuss the mechanism of contemplation [from a photon, through a signal, etc.] and call it “the handler inside the Self” and then about “I”, but again inside, which contemplates “This same thing”, already as a result of processing and again — “Consciousness” turned out to be inside, this is what we focused on and discuss. You will say: — It looks like a trick. — The reaction is understandable, but let us maintain attention. Let us explain (even if it is early) that the cyclicity “to inside, inside, and inside,…” is due to the four-dimensionality, but the ambiguity arises due to the Duality of the “I”;

However, everything is solved quite simply: reasoning — we say that we are immersed inside, and to the “I”, but, at the same time, we are always inside the “Consciousness”. This is tracked very simply — any situation can be realized only in the corresponding space, in the “Consciousness” and by means of “It”. “I” acts as an active trigger and initiator, in the conditions of reality = in space, and realizing this space in the same time;

Consciousness is always outside (a priori, and in any case);

However, we would like to find a simpler scheme (concept) — in the hope of offering you more transparent examples, and to cite them as evidence as a consequence of other, more understandable, conclusions. Therefore, for now we will only assert the following — anything, anything, is and can exist only relatively. This has a special meaning. Let us recall the Harmony of the World (inner Balance). In connection with the established absolute impossibility of the unrelated existence of the “I”, an important conclusion follows:

“I” exists <mutually> relative with (-to) “Consciousness”;

According to the Fact of Being and the Act of Self-Validity — “I” is the Active aspect. From the position of any person — this is the Fact of Being “I” and “My life Activity” in this regard. “Consciousness” always seems static, and provides “I” with the opportunity to manifest Activity. This harmonious relationship is the fundamental basis — the mutual relativity of [“I” | and “Consciousness”] (also in accordance with the inherent relativity, this is a balance: Static | and Dynamic), which represents a Single two-aspect Entity:

[“Global aspect of the Entity” | and “Real aspect Entity”];

All this reliably proves that “Consciousness” is outside of everything Existing, and “I” — manifests “Its Activity” being inside the Static “Consciousness”. When trying to reason about this in relation to the “Global aspect of the Essence” to “Consciousness”, then Its position is abstract, and is everywhere, but “Consciousness” in any case <and logicaly> is outside of all;

We also ask that you take into account the fact that we are researching, although we think and are accustomed to conditions that literally do not correspond to what we are discussing here, therefore we sometimes have to, to tell the truth, be creative, consider the static in sequential dynamics, which in fact can be dynamic and static at the same time, and we include the Two-Aspect “I” among such “things”.

When we attribute everything static to the nature of Consciousness, we should take into account that Consciousness realizes Spaces that are static by definition, but the content located in them is contemplated as dynamic. On the other hand, any content is only contemplated as dynamic, showing the static state of the object at each point of the wave of its dynamic state, successively one after another (a paradoxical fact). This is not a factual dynamic, but in practice (and in experience!) it is contemplated and taken into account exactly this way, and not otherwise. The <as if> visible three-dimensionality is also doubtful, which in fact is two-dimensional images, and three-dimensionality, in their relationship, is only understood and realized, but we not seen, otherwise would see one side of the cube more, additionally, and could see what is “behind the high fence” :). So, we got one more very interesting postulate:

Unusual knowledge can only be obtained in the most unusual way;

For effective research it will be useful to keep in mind and take into account everything we already know — it will require a look at the studied picture as a whole, and from different positions. “Consciousness” is only intuitively and mentally understood as Space. To be more precise, “Consciousness” is primary, that is, as if “above space”, beyond, it is level (∞+1), and is implied by the fundamental “like hardware” part, while Space (like any objects) are some software realization of the “place for images” — no less ephemeral and virtual, which we mean an image on a monitor or a volumetric hologram (made of colored sparks);

“Space” (volume) — is realized only statically relative to everything that is contemplated ‘located’ inside. Any objects located in Space are temporary (extremely unstable), dynamic, both inside and outside. It is always necessary to keep in mind that space is realized inaccessible to sensory perception, that is — we do not feel it and do not see it, but we are aware of its presence due to the relativity of the objects located in it. We especially note the fact that any <all> objects exist relative to space and even a single object in space (air, for example) can exist unhindered, that is, without the need to have relativity to other objects (it arises when there are more than one object);

* * *

Geometrically, space is easiest to imagine in the form of a spheresince the radius in all directions is “equal to infinity’. The absence of space limits is beyond doubt, since space is realized through “Consciousness” as a wave function. Given the fundamental and direct contact with reality, Space, as we understand, has a unique and amazing property that is not inherent in objects, namely: it has no properties, dimensions, and is potentially infinite. Being the basis for the realization of objects in the conditions of reality, space is fundamental;

fig. 2
(the Point in the center of space is “I”)

The Systemic Function of Space is realized partially, as needed, when we are present and pay attention. The boundary of Space will retreat when approaching it, that is, Space is infinite, but — precisely preliminary. For example, if you fly to the “Nearest Star”, need to realize the “pre-existing space”, and fly at the speed of light for years, or billions of years;

With such a structure (of the system), the dimensions cannot be an obstacle, and do not have much significance, as well as time, therefore — anything is realized equally simply and instantly, a glass, trees and a cluster of galaxies. However, to study and gain experience, the dynamics of these objects and the situation — a process in time and space are necessary;

With constant attention -> in the direction of a specific point of concentration, the function of the realization of Space is interpreted and presented as an endless cycle, with expansion in all directions and moving away from the center — at the speed of light, as is appropriate in these conditions;

* * *

No, of course we are not in the matrix, and this is not a computer program. There is no point in creating this at the risk of making a mistake — everything works fine as is. Yes, for better understanding, we sometimes use terms and words “software, program, processor, etc.” implying the structure and functionality of a living being — scientifically proven at the level of physical processes, which we have been observing and successfully studying for hundreds of years.

This is not a vain and greatest work — with one caveat — we studied the “Contemplated”, but not the external, but only the structure of the images visible to us (“things”), a kind of “Parade of Illumination of Elementary Particles”. With such a structure, it is not at all surprising that objects, when they are very close, consist of particles that do not touch each other <ephemeral, by the way>, that is why everything is so complex, literally — like the entire volume of physics, because it (physics) studies precisely this “enchanting phenomenon”;

* * *

There can be no talk of external physical reality, we have reliably established this and repeated it more than once, but for ease of application in our research, it is necessary to understand many principles (seemingly obvious);

We propose to formulate from what is already known:

The Real Status of an object is its visible Status, corresponding to the current state — “an object with imposed experience”, and according to the new existing conditions;

Here, the concept of “Status” implies an ephemeral, but concrete state of the Idea of an object, in relation to other objects in a related situation, and according to strictly defined conditions. If the change in the state of an object is expressed by a wave function, then the point of attention (concentration) will always correspond to a specific moment of realization, and then the point seems to move along the wave of change of the object. In reality, we see a static state at a specific point, and each subsequent moment is different, at the next point, and then the next, and so on… The object, in this case, is contemplated as dynamic in all respects, both inside and outside.

It is necessary to clarify the following about the contemplated moment — the really visible state represents precisely the final condition, that is, the state in which the object has already been completely transformed, and will be available in experience in a new state. We understand It as two-component: Idea + Wave of state; Looking at a fresh apple on the table implies Its Idea — this is the Apple Itself and + Condition of changing the state of a specific object, taking into account all factors. Let’s say we put an Apple on the table at home, and went on a trip for six months. When we return and, remembering the apple, look at the table, we will see a rotten (half-decomposed), but already dry apple. That is, the Idea + the Condition that in an environment with room temperature, the apple will turn into what we saw after returning. In the given example, the conditions will be your experience in which apples spoil. Even if you did not see how the apple changed in the process, but a point on the wave of its state will not cause an error, based on the relationship of many, many factors in this situation, including physics, chemistry, biology, etc. If there is a Hamster in the house, in a cage, and he suddenly escapes, then the Entity will take it into account as a condition, then the Apple will most likely be eaten. The probability, which we call “most likely” will include the behavior of the Hamster, his intelligence, ability and opportunity to climb on the table, … and so on;

Let us imagine a wave of each object, a supposed “frame of reality”, i.e. in one range of events and data on states, penetrated by a beam of the system function, perpendicularly “touching” one point of each wave, but corresponding to the moment — exposing what is contemplated in the form of a sensory result of processing, in the internal volume of the virtual 3D sphere of the contemplated reality (see fig. 3This is the final state of the transformation process: between the existing state of objects (in the situation) previously available in memory, and the state of already transformed objects, through the imposition of experience, which is stored as new experience. The point of attention has no relation to time, but represents a point “on a conditional scale” of the dynamic state of an object, as a process of transforming its past state into the future (if this is clearer). This does not prevent us from using time as a method of measuring relations, quantities, parameters and states (this is what happens), then — the point of the real moment on the “time scale” corresponds to some specific point of state on the “scale of the state of the object”, but this is not the same thing at all — these are different scales considered at the same moment, albeit correlative, but conditionally. That is — according to an intentionally created, specific condition:

Time is a method of measuring relationships in real conditions accepted in a particular “Society’;

It is necessary to explain that in order to understand some (many) Laws, Truths, “things”, we are forced to consider them, breaking them down into successive chains, although these elements are phenomena of a non-physical nature, and since we do not have suitable tools of knowledge, except for those we use, then assuming “criticism outside attempts at understanding’ — we will continue without apology.

The moment of reality seems to roll on the waves of experience and events, directly dependent on the intention of the “I”. If the temporal reality is an abstract boundary between the past and the future, then it is also a moment of transition, when the “future time” changes its status to “past”;

The temporal extension of the “reality frame” cannot be measured, it does not exist. Consequently, anything dynamic, contemplated is unique and cannot be repeated under any circumstances. An object now, and “the same object” but in billionths of a second — differ from each other, almost like different objects. Everything is simple — object “A” existed before, but under the influence of experience and conditions <of its change>, it was transformed into object “B”. Here (with a smile) “The Ship of Theseus” comes to mind. A very strange “problem”. Does it even exist? Or …is it also a Myth?

Let us digress for a moment to the “problem” of replacing all parts of a whole (either sequentially or simultaneously, which is irrelevant). This implies a certain monument, however, one can consider a similar act of replacing all parts of any “complex things’ with the question: Will the “Thing Itself” and the essence of the attitude towards it be preserved? Will not the replacement of all parts affect the attitude, due to the loss of the Status of the Original, and that true uniqueness and belonging that the “thing’ possessed in the first place?

Any object, as we have found out, at each moment differs from its previous form, mass, and composition. This is confirmed by physics, chemistry, logic, and also metaphysics;

Therefore, before the replacement of the parts of the “Ship of Theseus”, the parts were already different from the original. The ship can be considered original only when it belongs to Theseus, and when Theseus himself is on it. In this case, the Essence of the replacement is not important — he (Theseus) could replace any parts, and at any time, this did not violate the ship’s ownership. Theseus does not exist, as does his ship. If we only recognize the ship and honor it as a monument, then nothing can change this attitude, and nevertheless, the latter does not solve the problem, but — it is definitely solved by the fact that a “thing’ cannot be static in the conditions of reality, and the details of such, too, change at every moment. That is why the replacement of those parts that have become unusable — does not in any way violate the “essence of the Ship Itself’, as well as other “repaired things’, otherwise, we assert that — the originals actually do not exist, but our attitude is the only proof of the originality of “things’;

* * *

Let us once again pay attention to the realization. When the mechanism of contemplation is studied, we break it down into parts (studying step by step). In this case, we perceive and realize the processes that occur not step by step (that is, in the current mode) and the realization of reality, as a flow — dynamically, as if flooding (streaming) events [from outside -> into inside], filling the space. Here it is necessary to clarify that it is possible to assert that only the visible volume is filled, that is, that “there is something around the corner” — it is impossible to prove unless we use conditions that are still unknown to us. We have to take into account the periods (stages) that we consider in our reasoning, and their seemingly greater length in comparison with the transition of the point of attention (the point of concentration) along the wave of change of the object, or situation, “from one point to another’ — in this sense, there is no “real dynamics” at all, and the expression “real dynamics” is absurd to the point of impossibility, as are “real objects and situations”. That is, the processes being studied, “occurring in reality’, can be understood as “illusory’ and “pseudo-real’, …if try to scrupulously understand the “System Structure” — this will come in handy;

Let’s continue the research using the separation method, as before (we have no other choice), otherwise it is impossible to understand, the final result is extremely important to us;

It is obvious that the “current objects mass” dynamically fills the <surrounding> space — coming from the outside -> in. Considering the transition inward, when photons cross the body’s boundary (see fig. 1), and looking at the initially previous picture, we understand that we are contemplating inside ourselves, leaving the “past” outside — and falling inward, together with our body;

Transform the step-by-step reasoning into a flow, it turns out that being in an active state, we fly to inside Ourselves, participating in events — constantly trying to gain experience and this corresponds to the phrase: “To live, you need to learn” (develop);

Why “trying”? Because experience should be divided into passive (just empty), which could not be extracted — which was missed in the development process, and effective — i.e. completely new, extracted through existing experience, necessary for further development and useful;

While exploring, we must constantly remember about the current flow (as a condition), more precisely: about our flight into the Self and immersion into the “I”. This is very important. There is a valuable meaning in connecting this interesting fact with the “catchphrase’ of Delphi: “know thyself”. The complex can be too simple;

* * *

We will also consider the current notion of reality, perceived as a simple sequence of -broad- time frames. For example, if we are talking about the past, then this category includes long-term events, or certain extended states, which we draw in the same way as we imagine a “reality frame” and then return this picture for analysis — we do this again and again. Also, people often worry about something, and project a returning frame that irritates the psyche when they “voluntarily practice experiencing.” By the way, they receive a specific experience, which is subsequently necessarily transformed into something unpleasant;

Reality in such falsifications represents a whole “period of the necessary degree of clarity’. The clearest and most detailed “fresh past’ is available in memory for a shorter time than low-detailed events in their general presentation. Over time, the past will no longer be able to return as it was remembered at the moment of the realization of the long-past reality, since the attitude towards the events that happened will change radically. But, we are always learning the business of acquiring experience, and periodic analysis of similar <or similar> events, with special persistence, will lead to the acquisition of new experience, possibly more valuable than when analyzing the “obvious original’ — when we faced with a given situation “under real conditions”;

fig. 4
(wide time frames are supplemented with data from memory)

If we assume a “time machine” :) and move to a familiar past — for the traveler everything will be different, not like before, but completely new, and he will get a new experience. Everything that we do not see constantly, or almost daily — when meeting can turn out to be an amazing surprise;

It is appropriate to briefly talk about the future. First of all, it should be understood that the future as such does not exist, but one can fantasize in imagining it. The future, that is, “in mental space’, is realized only taking into account the existing experience, and if you suddenly move with a time machine “into the future’, five years ahead, and then return to the starting point, then when these same five years have passed, but in the usual manner, the place of visit will be realized completely differently, taking into account the experience acquired during the past five years, but in completely different conditions, including the experience gained when visiting the future using a time machine. And yet, this is nothing more than fantasy, because the future does not exist, but, from the current point of realization, as we have already established, it (the future) is formed from the existing experience, but travel to the past is most likely possible, or will become possible. But, there are also oddities;

* * *

If we assume that our X100-great-great-children (that’s ~5 thousand years about) did invent a time machine and traveled to our days. Theoretically, when returning back, they could take a traveler from our time with them, with the purpose of visiting (him) the future. In our 5000 years, with the complete absence of time for the Entity, and taking into account the exponential growth of the level of technology — they already have such a device, and then the UFOs flying everywhere — it is they (i.e. earthlings, people) from the future, flying and living among us, with the purpose of studying and, probably, correcting events in their time. They do not make contact because of the threat (development) of dangerous consequences due to interference. Let’s call it fantasy and continue, here, our down-to-earth :) research (just joke);

* * *

The future is only imagined, although the near future is assumed to be quite clear, and even as if it is visible, but it is far from a fact that it will be exactly as it is visualized. However, having even vague plans, we can anticipate the research and say that the flow of events, which seems to be habitual spontaneity, is “controlled’ by the “System of Entity Development”, but we will not go into this topic, at this stage it will simply amuse our wild fantasies;

We understand that “Reason”, as an instrument (“soft’, or software processor) — has an indirect relation to absolutely everything, for we are not even able to think of Ourselves without using Its comprehensive functionality;

“Reason” never leaves us as long as we (being in our right mind) are able to identify ourselves and qualify our own actions <...through the sense of conscience and moral laws>.

Thus, we separate the “I” from the “Reason”, there are grounds for this. Without the “Reason”, the “I” cannot recognize itself, define itself as concrete, or as actually existing, and precisely in a concrete body.

Therefore, “Reason” is an instrument, and “I” is not it (“Reason”). Consequently, “I” has no fundamental relativity to “Reason”, since, when available, It is “the Own Reason of the concrete I”. When the “I” realizes (this: ‘create’; through its “Consciousness”) its own existence in the conditions of reality, then — [“I” + “His Reason”] appears indivisible. “Reason”, without an operator (“I”) is the most ordinary wave function, and cannot exist independently in the conditions of reality — this is unthinkable due to an internal error, or, if we deliberately make such an error, then, logically, “I” will turn out to be transcendental, just as everything would become incomprehensible, including what we are discussing (not only here);

Without Reason everything is meaningless and incomprehensible;

Some people can go into the astral plane. The Reason, in this case, remains active together with the “I” and allows us to state this exit, i.e. — it also ‘leaves’ the body, if we can look at it (the body) from the outside and at the same time recognize it, lying separately, as our own;

We also know that in dreams the Reason functions rather strangely, but quite successfully, the “I” can think, experience emotions and manifest intention. It is also clear that the Reason is not space | the body is not the Reason, and | the Reason is not part of the body. The “I” defines itself exclusively through the Reason.

Therefore, in the process of cognition we will imply that “I” is rational (have Reason), possesses and controls Reason. “I” is and exists only in relation to Consciousness; Considering that “I”, the entire World, that is, everything absolutely, cannot exist outside of Consciousness, then Reason arises as a consequence of experience — forming and developing literally from scratch (presumably start in the process of conception). From all this it follows that the Reason is individual and absolutely unique, this is reliably proven and confirmed;

* * *

The strange thing is that even thoroughly understanding the entire logical chain, the Reason always tries to find a clue that maintains a connection with previous ideas about the structure of the World, being oppressed by the influence of stereotypes and other mental parasites, however, it is necessary, having discarded the dross of ignorance — to understand and imagine as it really is, without any emotions, extraneous thoughts and doubts. From position of everyone: “I want to understand this, and develop as effectively as possible”;

TWO-ASPECT (DUALISTIC) ENTITY

It is absolutely clear and obvious to us how the scheme of the contemplation mechanism leads to complete isolation and blocks the “Idea of the external reality of objects independent of “Consciousness”. At the same time, we also understand that we are talking about the impossibility of the existence of the physical World — such as we imagined it before, but otherwise nothing changes, except for the extremely important (!) emotional psichic relations. The contemplated remains the same. In itself, the Knowledge of the Structure of the World cannot manifest activity by its own Will, and magically influence the boiling of water in a kettle, will not melt ice, will not make the faded beautiful, etc. — this is not a spell. We are, however, sure that this knowledge can be used, but only at will and thanks to certain practices, which are not discussed here, because This is the practice itself, all the rest are, for the most part, secondary. The one who will be able to realize This essence will forever change the attitude towards Himself, that is, it is implied by an equal attitude towards the World as a whole, towards Humanity, Society, and towards everything living and nonliving, including all situations. This unusual Knowledge will help to realize Happiness, to love Himself, the World, God, and Everything Absolutely — without any limitations and exceptions;

* * *

Photons act on the eye cell -> The cell initiates signals that go to the brain -> The signals are processed, and then -> “I” see what seems external to me. “I” understand that this phenomenon is provided by systemic features, and is only a sensory representation of the results of signal processing — that is, waves originating from the “Sources of My own history, and modified by experience to My appearance.” We already knew that according to our physics, some of the signals are electrical, we agreed to call them that, but what are they really? — we do not know;

So, in the process of this research we conclude that we are, and were, in an “isolated bubble of closed space’, which seems common to us, but upon comprehension turns out to be individual;

Let us remember that we began to reason with the aim of studying the mechanism by which we “see right now’;

Let’s draw an analogy of the result, that is, we are in a separate room (as if already inside “Consciousness’, it is similar), and, in these conditions, we say that we are in isolation, and, pointing the index finger towards the eyes, we say that we see everything that is happening in this room, but precisely inside “Consciousness’, thereby, as if once again, again, we dive inside Ourselves. Before, we have already gone through this practice and understand that not everyone will be able to imagine it, but many already know that after understanding, it will turn out to be too simple. We hope you will master it;

Constructing reality, we dive inside the “I” -> dynamically forming our “perspective future”, taking into account the fading past, as if this remaining outside of us. In this process, it seems to us that we are contemplating the external <surrounding us> World. It reminds us of a ride on the back platform of the last carriage, looking at the railroad track running away into the distance. In fact, we contemplate, extracting new experience, like events receding into the past — independently choosing the necessary, effective facts and knowledge for rational development, even if the judgment and their qualification are purely subjective. Usually, soon, the “new experience” turns out to be last and already outdated, requiring correction, supplemented by newly extracted valuable facts, either on the basis of previous knowledge, or some special conditions — thus, a new experience is formed, and stored in memory (along with a situation that <probably> can be useful for careful analysis). This is repeated, and again;

Thus, it can be stated that any experience is used as part of the data, as a basis for extracting new experience. Another important part of the data are: a). Ideas of “things” in their ideal form; and b). Conditions that influence both the dynamics and change of all objects in the content of a specific current situation, and can also influence the semantic change of the situation itself;

The potential of a situation is its attractiveness, which in turn reflects the degree of saturation with experience and the interest of the “I” (Need of the Essence) in participation, and the intention to be active in the desire to extract new experience, until completely exhausted. But, the complete extraction of experience from the situation is absolutely impossible (it is also, in principle, infinite, in terms of information), however, the “Essence” strives for development, absorbing the maximum experience from what is available, but — a lot depends on the ability to effectively extract experience. It is quite possible that a situation is filled with events from which it is not possible to extract any effective and rational experience, except for visual, although for a writer or artist it may be invaluable — this means that the “Entity” needs it;

Interest is of great importance, that is, the information that interests the “Entity”, as content contained in the data flow — is a catalyst and energy for the manifestation of intention, the realization of reality and the formation of future events. This is incredibly important for those who are learning to manage reality (… there are many practices);

It is necessary to draw your special attention to the fact that changes in static data on the Global level, preserved as consequences of the activity of the “Real aspect of the Self” (if someone moved a stone, then it will remain moved), are not yet reliable evidence of the “Collective Synchronic Realization” of reality, but so far we have not discovered any expressed prerequisites explaining any principles by which this would be possible, therefore, until now, we are investigating the “Nature’ of only one (from the position of each) “Real aspect of the Self”;

“Man is a social being”. We assume that people are not phantoms, and for this reason we have a great interest and a natural need to discover and study the mechanism of Joint Realization of Collective Reality. In addition, we want to find out (even theoretically) whether other civilizations and Global factors exist? Can they be dangerous?, or are they dependent on the intention, as well as the activity of other “Real aspects of the Self”;

shaped sphere — diameter equal to infinity

fig. 5
(representation as a section of the current space along the equator)

Let us imagine and consider this as a diagram on a two-dimensional plane of paper. In figure 2, we practiced cutting an infinite three-dimensional space along the equator — this is a flat circle, the thickness of one conventional point (fig. 5). Let us assume our current space, in the center of which we are now located and discussing the structure of the World (through knowledge of the mechanism of contemplation), pointing to the transition inside the Self, where the “I in the body” participates in the situation, extracting this experience in the contemplated frame (“I” see);

through the center –> into inside

fig. 6
(immersion within oneself one level inside)

After immersion within Ourselves, we are again in the same conditions, we point to the inner “I” and to Its inner contemplation. This immerses us to another — the next level within Ourselves (see fig. 6). We have depicted this diagram on a plane, but by concentrating we understand that this is a sphere with a central point in the center, and this point goes inside Itself, that is, each of us, and turns out to be another space with a central point inside (or compare with the “point of infinity”);

Think about this amazing phenomenon — this point (“I”) is infinite inside Itself — that is, “Mine? I” strangely slips away when trying to touch (It). Each space, at the same time, seems to inherit the Center (“I” seems bottomless, that is, the Abyss — in some, but, certain sense). We are able to do this procedure as many times as we want. The result will be the same. It should be noted — the data uses a stream of photons as transport -> flying inside the “I”, however, the contemplated “fills’ the realized space precisely from the outside, from the past. The future is formed from the past (!).

This means that data enters memory through a certain “I Axis”, through Consciousness and Reason (we called it the signal processing process), is interpreted and qualified, transformed into sensory images, and –> fills the space… from beyond the invisible edge of its limits. All this literally arises, appearing as something contemplated, as if in a giant, magical 3D theater:

∞.. through the center –> inside –> through the center –> inside.. -∞

fig. 7
(immersion within oneself two levels into inside)

Considering that “Consciousness” is out-of-limits and realizes any spaces, it should be explained that multidimensionality cannot be a structural or programmatic problem, since the increase in dimensionality has even a very banal regularity. Another thing is that we will encounter the problem of representation, and without visualization we will not be able to fully explore (the next higher) higher dimensions;

And yet, we will be able to do something. Then our eyes will truly open and it will happen soon, or very soon, but within the framework of this study;

We suggest recalling, or paying attention to, this widely known feature (fundamental pattern):

The mother spaces contain an infinite number of subordinate spaces, each of which is 1 less in dimension.

Zero-dimensionality — Abstract Dot;

One-dimensionality — A straight line connected in one direction from an infinite number of zero-dimensional dots;

Two-dimensionality — a plane, composed of an infinite number of parallel lines;

Three-dimensionality (Volume) — consists of an infinite number of superimposed <on top of each other> planes;

Four-dimensionality* (Unicus) — is composed of an infinite number of nested, successively inheriting the central point (outside –> inside) three-dimensional spaces. Unicus [lat] — personal, unique;

*Four-dimensionality is the main fundamental property of the four-dimensional construction of space;

Five-dimensionality (Generalis) — is composed of an infinite number of four-dimensionalities, with axes directed inwards. Generalis [lat] — general. To understand five-dimensionality, it is necessary to understand four-dimensionality;

According to this method, we can easily assume any dimension, in theory it will be correct, but we cannot present a method and practical geometry, because for this knowledge a logical basis is necessary, that is, a reason leading to understanding is needed. The fifth dimension (and five-dimensionality) is not easy to imagine, we will try to explain it first, and then we will try to depict it on a two-dimensional plane, but first let’s look at Unicus.

From the examples that we have discussed above and thanks to the presentation, we understand that the axis of the fourth dimension is infinite and directed inward and outward. In addition, it is necessary to understand that “Consciousness” has no limitations in terms of realization of any dimensions. Both “Consciousness” and the “Global aspect of the Entity”, as “Causes” are ‘out-of-limits’, and are expressed in this way:

∞+1 and –∞–1

Where ∞+1 is the out-of-limits outside and is “Consciousness’, and -∞-1 is the out-of-limits inside, that is, the “Global aspect of the ‘I’”, realized with fundamental relativity to <Its> complete opposite (as a method and basis of being) — a very important “Real aspect of the Global ‘I’”. For understanding the four-dimensionality, this is quite enough, however, we will have to return to this, otherwise we will encounter the natural barrier of Reason, when studying the “Collective Synchronous Realization”. It should be understood that we are considering the general structure, but from the position of each being it is no different;

Are you wondering, What is the difference between the “Global aspect of the Entity” (that is, the “Global aspect of the ‘I’”, which is the same thing) and the “Real aspect of the Global ‘I’”? It is not the time to talk about this yet, but for clarification it should be said that: “The Global aspect of the Entity” is the “One Great ‘I’”, that is, All “Selves” — of each being in their infinite number, which are defined in this relation as “Not I”, in relation to That which Is in reality and participates in situations as the “Real aspect of the Global ‘I’” — as a necessary Balance of opposites (we understand relativity as equal). This relativity is fundamental, equivalent, interdependent, and is ensured by the fact of “Systemic necessity”;

FOURTH DIMENSION, FOUR-DIMENSIONALITY

2D projection (from slice “0” to structure view)

fig. 8
(Unicus — sphere — four-dimensionality, along the axis of the fourth dimension, in the direction “inward and outward”)

“Consciousness” is thus accessible to analysis, that is, it does not belong to the category of “incomprehensibility”, if we have “gotten to It logically” and through research (see fig. 8). All this, in general, can be called the Manifestation of the “Entity”, which means that this is really not the limit, based on the provided possibilities <apparently limitless>;

Level “0” is the starting point and place of our investigations. Level 1 is the supposed external, that is, the “past’, based on our manifest reality. All levels with a minus marker are internal (-1, -2), that is, precisely those that we “touched’ in this investigation (page 43);

The structure of the four-dimensional space fully corresponds to the Solipsistic World Order, which implies the Condition “There is only I”, and nothing more — the rest is not provable and does not actually exist. This teaching is extremely logical and therefore beautiful as Truth. The idea of Solipsism is ~2500 years old — many recognize it as fundamental, because it is considered irrefutable. At this stage, our research does not go beyond the framework of Solipsism, but — we have not finished the research, and have no right to allow even a shadow of bias. We are interested only in facts, and we will do everything to find answers to the questions posed here. “It’s not evening yet, gentlemen…”;

* * *

In three-dimensional space, the fourth-dimensional axis is the “inward and outward part of the line” that breaks off due to dimensionality mismatch. The inward part of the line is also the Axis of Data Flow, used (and using now) by the “I” when extracting experience reality <in current also>. The visualization here is limited, but clear enough (on the next page, figure 9, red line #4):

fig. 9
(4th dimension axis in 3D space is represented by the red line 4)

We know from practice that the idea of four-dimensionality cannot cause any particular burden. In order to avoid difficulties in “Understanding the ‘I’” or studying the structure of the World in the future, it is better to understand this now, otherwise you will encounter incomprehensibility. But, after realizing it will turn out to be fairly simple, but the most important thing is that at the moment of realizing you will acquire a special advantage — the ability to think in completely different categories using four-dimensionality, and until the reorganization of the Reason does not occur, further reasoning will have an inaccessible meaning, and will not be understood by you properly — as it is necessary;

The Dimensionality Barrier is insurmountable without Knowledge of the Method and a clear understanding of each subsequent structure;

True Knowledge does not come by itself, but it can be acquired if you study with special interest, have a desire and show intention. The real and factual, anything, always has logical, explainable grounds and this is especially true for knowledge and experience;

The awareness of Four-dimensionality can be facilitated by a look from one and every point in the volume of three-dimensionality. This appears to be the fourth direction “inside and out’ and is accessible only to Creatures and things that correspond to the “Four-dimensional Nature of Reason’. That is, if the Reason of a Creature does not have the special functions necessary for the awareness of Four-dimensionality, then the Space realized <at Its Request> will not be adapted for objects of such an order. Thus, “Four-dimensional Constructions’ will not be accessible — due to the lack of “Bases Corresponding to Them’;

Every point in Space of any degree of dimensionality is potentially an intersection of All dimensions;

For example, a person who is aware of five dimensions understands that each point in four-dimensional space is a five-dimensional integration. That is, in his view, the axes of five dimensions pass through each of them. By analogy, each point in three dimensions is an intersection of four axes for a being who is aware of four dimensions. This is a natural attitude towards points in any space;

Let us formulate it differently: All points of any Space are located in a General Structure of infinite degree of dimensionality (and complexity, which is the same. Complexity, as Nesting, is provable and indicates a pattern related to dimensionality… since chaos is impossible);

We often come across the fact that Dimensions are relevant exclusively for the Alives, and can be used only by the “Alive Beings” (“World for the Alives”), because only the “I” (the “Real aspect of the Entity’) affects the “Consciousness” and, in contrast to this: Objects do not have Will, cannot act independently and do not have the property and ability to realize Reality. Moving, anything (and anywhere) is a detail of the realization of Reality, and only the Alive (!) can be Present (Or, Assuming — but then This does not exist, there are only Conditions of a specific wave applicable to pure Ideas) can assert this;

It should be understood that the awareness of Dimensionality is comprehensible and acquired as Knowledge and Experience, and this applies not only to the understanding (figuratively) of the logical structure, but also to the ability of geometric representation of a strictly defined and corresponding “construction’, an order of magnitude more complex — in comparison with the subordinate, (younger), subsidiary structure (...like part of the method only);

However, does it have to be space? What are we talking about? — We imagine space as a volume, the closest ones belong to this category, that is, the fourth and fifth, but there is the second (plane), the first (straight line) and zero (point). With our level of development, we are not yet able to think about the possibility of some other dimensions, below the point, or with a minus value, like minus first, minus second, but if we are able to think about it, then they exist, but there are no Ideas about their ‘meaning’. <Dark Otherworlds?> :);

It is obvious that at the moment we cannot adequately discuss this, and in order not to make mistakes, it is better to stop at the fact that negative dimensions cannot exist <according to our concepts, from our position this is so>. If the Perspective appears, then nothing will stop us;

SOCIETY AND HUMANITY

Obviously, we are not alone. This is wonderful. Everything we know and everything we can do — we received from those who were around, and they, in turn, learned it from other people. Society is a carrier of information and an inexhaustible source of almost all opportunities, knowledge and skills, not excluding those that seem banal: the ability to speak, to use the simplest things — to eat with a spoon, to maintain posture while standing on two legs, etc. It is to Society that we owe our existence as Homo sapiens. History, Science, and Culture, for all this, we sincerely thank specific people, our family, the closest Society, Society, and Humanity as a whole. It is a pity that some people treat this with a certain smirk.

— — —

All participants in real events play a huge role in the formation of experience, and are often the main initiators, while we only observe (… as it seems to us). Humanity is developing under the pressure of many factors, ancient stereotypes, foundations, infected with numerous authoritative opinions, up to the most delusional (each at own level), and is subject to the influence of dozens, or even hundreds — teachings and false teachings.

Although, theoretically, there may be a universal, “Adaptive Worldview” — which does not contradict the basic teachings (respected, necessary, ofcource) teachings having the status of, literally, “honorable and fundamental’, that is — not because of the “technology of penetratingly tormenting exposition’, but precisely “by the Essence of the content and enormous significance for Society’. The meaning of this study will not allow you to make a mistake and contradict the conclusion:

Society (the object of attention and sincere care) is the thinking part of myself <from the position of each>;

Understanding the essence of the “Entity” calls for showing all kinds of care and attention to people, to Humanity and Society. A person with a worldview that identifies Himself with the World is imbued with universal mutual love, is not capable of starting a war, offending another person, or harming anyone — everything he sees is dear to him, because he perceives the World as Himself — having all the necessary grounds for this, which is important.

This concept activates the intention of the “I” to learn and develop in all directions. A person caring about society, begins to make discoveries, to understand the meaning of existence and the need to live as long as possible — thereby forming a conscious Path to Eternity, preserving the Own “I” unchanged, not having lost its ‘self-identification’. These are purely personal <one’s> subjective criteria and qualifications, which a person can judge exclusively independently;

* * *

Reasoning, here, we are dealing with morality, however, we need to understand, discarding all emotions. Studying the mechanism of contemplation, we came to the conclusion about the conditions of absolute isolation. Based on this, the World is realized individually, that is — we cannot assert what is primary — “I” or “Humanity”? , as anything realized in space turns out to be secondary for us. When we begin any discussions about the “I” and its nature, we assume that we are talking about the Cause of the World, and the Essence of the Beginnings, at the moment of the “First Origin”. In complete isolation, we cannot assume any other Beginning except the “I”. That is, the first moment of opening eyes is precisely the Birth of the World, or the “First Explosion’. While this is so;

Бесплатный фрагмент закончился.

Купите книгу, чтобы продолжить чтение.