Бесплатный фрагмент - Kazakhs and Turks

At the Turkish Championship meeting, Galatasaray football club fans set a world record for noise — 131.76 decibels.

The siren of a fire truck gives 100 decibels, a moving train gives 110 decibels. The noise of a jet plane is 130 decibels. At 130 decibels, pain begins, and at 150, you can go crazy — this is already a combat weapon.

The frenzy of Galatasaray’s Turkish fans is very similar to the actions of football hooligans — ultras of Greek and Serbian clubs. Where did this come from?

These people are united by history. The most recent shared dormitory for Turks, Greeks, and Serbs is the Ottoman Empire.

On closer inspection, Turkish, Greek, and Serbian inhabitants are no different from us. But we can be divided in a situation of catharsis like football. Our fans are sitting quietly, and we can say disciplined; that is, we are not only different in appearance, but we are generally different. We are the inhabitants of the steppes and plains. We, the steppe people, shouted hurrah..Ah, when they rode at the enemies. The rest of the time, we were silent. We Kazakhs are a disciplined people. We go on the attack and shout only at the leader’s command, necessarily an authoritative person. If we don’t like the leader, we silently leave the camps — we scatter in different directions — the steppe is large and broad.

You can’t get far in the Caucasus, for example. You can climb to another peak together with your relatives. But how many people can rise?

Why do mountaineers talk loudly, even if they are standing next to each other (for Georgians, the most obvious thing)

Yes, because of the mountains. Perhaps the morning fog is in the way; the stones are falling, and the river is making a lot of noise in the rocks. You see? Why do Georgians talk loudly next to each other? That’s why the Turkish fans are making the loudest noise. The answer can be found in the Caucasian genes of these people — nothing else.

Kazakhs will never join a noisy crowd; Kazakhs generally shun noise. If Kazakhs shout or raise their voices, it is an emergency. If the Kazakhs see a moving caravan, they will dock and join it quietly. Unless, of course, strangers are noticed in the caravan. They will also remain silent at first. They won’t scream. Only Kazakhs guyss emit specific screams, especially during a horse race or a cockpar. Non-Kazakhs cannot make such «Kazakh» sounds of triumph and strength, but each Kazakh is strong one by one, not together, even if brothers surround him. The brothers do not make sounds of triumph — lasting a second or two. This sound of Kazakh celebration scares outsiders. When young horsemen see graceful beauties, they make the same sounds through the open window of their jeeps. No one screams like that — only Kazakhs

Chapter 1

Turks and Kazakhs

War must be inevitable and vital. As long as the life of the nation is not in danger, war is murder.

Mustafa Kemal Ataturk

The Zerefs are the first, the most massive group of self-reflection. These are warriors, ordinary people, workers, and philistines. From a historical perspective, the self-reflection of Zeref means warriors, members of a tribal collective, where each Zeref, if necessary, is a warrior, alien to another Zeref from another tribe. I would not say that modern nationalists use the rudiments of the primitive culture of warriors. After modernization, people with Zeref reflection can be found anywhere in the civilized world. In a crisis, even the intelligentsia — the nation’s gold — the Remids turn into savages out of anger and resentment against other savages and barbarians. It is this fallen intelligentsia that forms the idea of fascism. The Zerefs self are not capable of forming thought forms, except for actions; for them, feral, embittered Remids form the Nazi ideology, but mostly the officers of the SS and blackshirts detachments are the Zeremids — children of the rural intelligentsia. In general, after modernization in the 20th and 21st centuries, the rudest people, philistines, and people with low tastes and needs are Zerefs. The Zerefs are biased and proud when they use the primary tones of the Zerefs. The Zerefs conventionally has two colors, shades, many sounds to express emotions, two sides, and two sensations — good and evil. Evil and good they feel and understand as satiety and prosperity today only of their family, and in the past — prosperity and satiety only of their kind, clan, tribe, and people. They say either yes or no, but at the same time, they always look at a person’s age when answering. Thus, all traditional people have very good qualities; they respect and care for old people.

The Zerefs understand the idea well as a pleasant emotion because they draw satiety and prosperity again as a minimum for family and a maximum for people. The idealism of the masses ends when the people do not receive the promised, for example, in the form of communism, as happened with the Zerefs of the USSR or at the time of democracy — this is already a typical example of the birth of Nazism and fascism. The leader of the Zerefs must necessarily be a strong leader because the Zerefs are ideological; they must know that they will receive democracy or communism. Communism and democracy are interpreted by the Zerefs not as equality, although the equality of the Zerefs is always welcomed, the lands or trophies that the Zerefs are plucking. In a democracy, the Zerefs are like the first place. Or any honorable new place because it is democracy that creates the illusion of a new, necessarily decent place. In any idea, the Zerefs want to leave the social bottom they occupied in the previous formation, the old world, and the last state. Yes, Zerefs, after modernization, are a crowd of Philistines. They will welcome democracy precisely because of mass opportunity. The conditional bottom is excited that all bottom creatures will float to the surface and live there. Unfortunately for the Zerefs, they are creating a hierarchy again — with a new bottom and new top gold, with the new elite and the despicable rabble. A strong leader reduces the activity, or rather the greed of the Zerefs, and teaches the Zerefs to work and be responsible. If the Zerefs do not have a dictator, they will resort to the old habit of fighting for a new place of honor.

Chapter 2

The love of power is in the nomads' blood

Yes, there are many incomprehensible things in the behavior, not only in the temperament of the Turks. To simplify the situation, we can say that many things would be incredible to those Turkomans and officially to the Oghuz Turks if they from the 11th century could communicate with their civilized descendants. But this is impossible. We know that. Centuries have passed since the ordinary residence of the Anatolian population and the Oghuz newcomers, before all the Ottomans were formed, then the citizens of the Turkish Republic. They say that there are no pure Turks today (except for the nomadic Turkomans on the border with Syria). Turkey is not just a mixed population; it is a population that has been woven over the centuries. This is a mixture of many peoples in the cauldron of the Ottoman Empire. Those Turkish features that are incomprehensible to Kazakhs are, instead, the quality of the indigenous population of the Near East. That’s why we don’t even understand Turkish somewhere. (For example, the Turks have never engaged in trade. Today, small businesses are well-developed in Turkey. Kazakhs have never been involved in trade, either. After 30 years of independence, they suddenly learned. But we have only 30 years left, and the Turks have 130 in their luggage. The difference is a century). This is not to mention the fact that the peoples who inhabited these territories were engaged in trade for 1000 years before the arrival of the Oghuz. Before the Turks came, life was generally different. There was a settled population of farmers in the Near East. Even before the creation of the Turkish Republic, that is, exclusively in Modern times, the Greek and Armenian clans were mainly engaged in trade. The Turks were involved in military affairs and made up the entire administration. In other words, the Turks were the managers of the empire.

Isn’t that what Turks and Kazakhs have in common, huh? Kazakhs, by the way, also like to command. (Even under the USSR, Kazakhs sought to occupy administrative positions. The people highly respected Kazakh administrators. «Kolynda folder, basynda hat» — they talked about Kazakh bosses in the 50s and 60s of the last century (if you see a hat on his head and a folder in his hands, then this is the Kazakh boss). The situation has not changed today. Kazakhs also want to get into administration and develop their family business. The richest are officials — everyone knows about this among the people. There is no difference between current officials and oligarchs who have gone into opposition. Only power made them rich. Now those who have fallen into disgrace are unhappy that they were kicked off the top. This is the face of the Kazakh opposition, by the way)

It is on the love of power that the Kazakhs converge with the Turks, thereby exposing the former steppe kinship.

But if you look at it from the outside, we are still different. We don’t understand everything in our dialogues, but our love of power is precisely the same. In addition, the Turks are very diplomatic (in any case, I talked with Turkish guys who appeared in Kazakhstan in the 90s. They talked very softly — as the people aptly say, do not yawn or open your mouth wide if you are with them. Behind the gentleness and diplomacy lies a sophisticated entrepreneurial spirit. A Turk can come to you in the spring and give you $ 2000 with the words biz dospyz goi (we are friends). Then, just a few months later, he suddenly showed up in the fall and asked for help — to give 20,000 $ «for a profitable business.» How could refuse? Isn’t that entrepreneurial? I’m sure the Kazakh is not capable of such a thing. Kazakh guys know Kazakh guys. The Kazakh does everything in silence. He asks without smiling. He sets it up if he needs to. If you refuse, he leaves in silence. But he’ll remember everything.

Of course, one cannot judge by one Turk. But the Turks are diplomats and businessmen — you can’t deny the Turks that. Never before Mustafa Kemal and his reforms had the Turks been engaged in tailoring because Armenians have always been tailors. But how many Turks have sewn leather jackets and other things for the Kazakhs and the world today? It is impossible to count. Today, the Turks are doing everything. They are successfully engaged (especially in construction; Turkish firms take contracts in Russia). Kazakhs need to take an example from Turks. I won’t say anything else.

You must look into history to understand what unites us and brings us closer (except for language). We were on opposite sides once; some nomads even spoke different languages. (Modern Uzbeks, for example, also expressed the languages of the ancient Iranian group, so what?). But now we are part of a vast family of Turkic people. There are 250 million of us. And 100 million of them are modern Turks. How did it happen? It needs to be figured out. We’ll have to dig very deep. I think this deep digging will be interesting.

Chapter 3

When empires fall, the mob gets stupid

Nothing demoralizes the people like defeat. We must pay tribute to the Ottoman Empire, which lasted almost as long as the Tokugawa Shogunate in Japan. The Japanese shogun suffered because of the proximity of the events. The Americans in 1858 showed traditional tactlessness — a warning salvo from the most modern guns took place in the Japanese port. All people instantly turned from Japanese Bakufu giants into Japanese burakumins dwarfs, unable to defend the islands. As for the Turks, the most severe defeat was inflicted on them near Vienna in 1683. But, as it was said, the empire took another two centuries to become a republic. For the Ottoman Empire to collapse, it took the defeat of Turkey as part of the Triple Alliance. Even the capture of Bayazed by Timur in 1402 or the defeat at Lepanto in 1571 from the Holy Alliance did not affect the fate of the Turks in any way. Because the Turkish nobility decided everything in the old days. The Turk’s empire held out for two more centuries. When the people decide, the empire falls faster.

(Nobody knows about this phenomenon yet, but my readers will be the first to know. To begin with, knowledge is the privilege of priests. If information comes first today because dependence on momentary knowledge has turned into a global drug addiction. People, modern humanity, have changed their knowledge of the news. News is also knowledge, but information does not give full power. The power over the world is given by systemic knowledge, and they are just part of the system of control over humanity. Humanity is given superficial knowledge, so people feel like Egyptian priests for a few minutes. But a crowd cannot consist of only priests — intellectuals, a crowd is a crowd, rabble, arrogant bloggers of social networks. It is on the total pride of the crowd that the calculation is made. Democracy adds to the absolute stupidity even more stupidity that all people allegedly are priests. Namely, all people are allegedly artists, writers, and bloggers. But all people cannot be beautiful. So, not all people can be writers. Why are they given the opportunity? So, having received information, people feel like «personalities» and «kill» real natural sages inside their world. The billions of people, that’s the redneck are lost about the self of the very rulers whom the most cynical writers call the 300 Committee — the world government. «Whoever owns the information owns the world.» Has everyone read this expression? Well, of course. If the head of the US Congress, Nancy Pelosi finds out where the Americans’ funds will be directed, her husband will buy shares of enterprises in these industries. The Pelosi family will become wealthy. Information is not knowledge. If people are allowed to look only at the tip of the iceberg, they will rejoice at the pieces of ice on the deck of the Titanic in the first minutes of the tragedy. Therefore, people were drummed into all ears from all sides about the fantastic killer virus. Before the planetary scam came to light, a dozen of my opponents called me an imbecile with a Dunning-Kruger symptom. This is just an indicator of pride from some upstarts and bloggers planted by the diabolical media; this is the deck of well-fed, self-satisfied idiots, hysterics, and others from the web rabble squad. Today, this new technology called democracy allows control of any state and any government precisely by stimulating the ambitions of small people.

Chapter 4

What is the reason for the war?

Now, it is necessary to explain how the former disciplined, quiet people from traditional communities and calm, ordinary people turn into monsters as "personalities."

What it looked like before.

When two Zerefs looked at each other, everyone knew who was the first and who was the second. Even the brothers’ relatives, with a difference of a few minutes, should always replenish the formation of conservative soldiers. Traditional society spends the least time peeping and looking, even in a crowd, when hundreds of eyes are looking at you; they already know a lot. This gazing is delayed for a more extended period. Suppose some mentors, teachers, and curators come to the people of the tradition and inform them that you are not any brothers. In that case, you are not a people, and they are market individuals; then, even the twins begin to argue about which personality is more important and who has ten life minutes more; after a while, the whole nation starts a fight, which market teachers, market mentors, and market curators call democratic reforms.

In fact, democracy cancels not only seniority and Zerefs are getting younger, but they also don’t want to give in and don’t want to die. The whole crowd is getting younger; even the elderly are ready to give way to the young in the next world — they wear fashionable clothes so that they are not recognized as old gues now and drink filtered water so that there are no kidney stones. Teenager brats approach the young men and address them like this: «Bro, let me smoke!» Disguised and trimmed «for democracy,» old bros are a little embarrassed, but they give (and who is greedy, says that there is no cigar). Suddenly, everyone’s age disappears. That’s what democracy is when the devils come to the twins. It is impossible to prevent the Zerefs from considering each other. When Zeref looks at you at any age, he knows where to stand: behind or in front of you. And old age is not the only conservative marker. However, democratic Zerefs from now on are always trying to deceive others, themselves, and time. People tell each other: «You’re still young, you’re still so young.» But it’s not because of democracy. These are still remnants of the conservative tact that remains with traditional people despite the devil’s propaganda.

«Good times give birth to weak people. Weak people breed difficult times.»

These words of the ancient Greek Plato explain well why devils -neighbors come to the Zerefs. Why a conservative society is suddenly engaged in reformation? It seems that everyone walked in a general formation and obeyed informal laws. Now, everyone’s gaze began to change to money. No one moves without a kick. They need a mate, obscenity, and then a kick. Are the traditional people lazy creatures? The first reaction to reforms is always a reaction. In any country, under any conservative regime, there is a part of the ruling elite, the so-called old men, clerics, who cannot be considered because of conscious blindness or laziness. The rabble and the common people cannot simultaneously replace the cream of society. The day comes, and the hour comes when respected people are escorted to the next world with appropriate honors, and none of the high ranks intends to cancel this tradition so far.

But the fact is that the long absence of war delays all procedures.

There is always a whole queue of honorary veterans at the central churchyard. People were used to burying their traditional elite. Funerals change funerals. There are monuments on the main square of the country. Thieves and crooks have already settled comfortably among the crowd to gawk now.

The season of the «long world» also greatly influences local evolution. A long peace softens the morals of Zerefs. Cunning people, cowards, crooks, and people from the Diaspora enjoy silence and funerals almost daily marches. The season of peace gives such an opportunity to penetrate all spheres because Zerefs lose their vigilance, stop watching, and do not look too closely. Requirements are reduced. The season of the long peace is undoubtedly perfect for cunning and weak people. When those most difficult times come after the good ones, people like to remember them: when they had the kindest ruler (for example, Soviet people remember General Secretary Brezhnev — the most empty and incompetent puppet), after him came frankly vague. A conservative world must end in war, but no one during this time asks themselves questions: how did these problematic times come? At this time, too many «twins» are born to go to war in the future (because boys are born warriors here, they must go to war. But till there is no such war).

Now I explain: all the cunning crooks, hypocrites, thieves — the elite of liberal reformers just got into all spheres because of the lazy gaze of dying old men and the grave mood inside the funeral procession. «Good times breed weak people.» Good times have many traits. But the most important feature of officials of good times is their beauty — kindness. The leaders may be bland, but the ruling nomenclature is selected by outwardly pleasant, sympathetic Komsomol members, singers, cosmonauts, and central television announcers. The ancient Greeks, Plato’s contemporaries, were just betting on physical perfection, the beauty of the body before ancient Greece lost. With decaying socialism, they relied only on the face, on the artists. In good times, all the artists are beautiful (in bad times, all the characters, on the contrary, are ugly and resemble freaks). No one looked closely at these artists because there were good times — these are the times of artists and hypocrites — weak people, future traitors, philistines, defectors but the population was fine. There was no one to envy. Conservative people begin to envy and interfere with each other when order is violated, including the traditional funeral procession. The reformers who come to the twins to wean them off, keeping the queue, don’t come just like that. In order for worms to appear, the soil must be dewatered.

In the Ottoman Empire in 1809, Mahmud 2 — the Turkish Peter 1 — ascended to the throne. In this pair, Russia was the first to carry out reforms. Turkish soldiers lost to Russia in 1806 — 1829. Precisely because elite old reactionaries and clerics surrounded Mahmoud 2. However, the vizier Alemdar Mustafa Pasha Bayraktar helped him ascend to the throne. Without Bayraktar, Mahmoud would not have succeeded at all.

But the liberal reforms of Mahmud 2 by the name of Tanzimat — were just a copy of Peter’s reforms. The Mahmud 2 dressed the whole yard in European clothes. The main reforms concerned the rearmament of the army. Mahmud abolished the janissaries, abolished the sipahia — the Turkish oprichnina — the old land system for military service — and replaced it with private property (ciftlik).

Yes, conservatives are going for reforms, primarily for military ones. Civil reforms are secondary to them. This applies to everyone without exception. It is before the turmoil that the «beautiful» civilian population begins to listen to the military because, by this time, all civilians are hypocrites, crooks, thieves, or potential crooks; thieves are the very products of a long peace.

The reforms that the most energetic people are trying to carry out are designed to replace the real war, while it has not yet taken place, with military mobilization. Therefore, all the Young Turks reformers, Egyptian «free officers», and Iraqi, Libyan, and South American black colonels are all products of liberal military reformism. All monarchs were reformers, including Turkish Selim 3, Mahmoud 2, Libyan Idris 1, and even the father of the last Iranian Shah Reza Pahlavi. They trained only the military for capture or the protection of their satrapies. But the war had to occur for the people to have Mustafa Kemal, Lenin, or Hitler.

Yes, war has an ugly face. But it is the war that the crowds are preparing, hundreds of pretty handsome men who are admired by millions of inhabitants of the «good season». In a peaceful period of time, Zelots, and strong figures like Mustafa Kemal cannot break through to the top in any way because mass ignorance, jealousy, therefore fear, and envy allow people to enjoy good rulers. In turn, not good rulers think not about honor but about memory, not about huge mazars and pyramids that will remind good times when it was they who ruled.

Chapter 5

Now everything is bought and sold

Since Modern times, the very method of developing new territories has changed. After the usual robber seizure of new territories, the conquistadors, pirates, (and even nomads) were always followed by unarmed people. They would have carried weapons, but they were forbidden to carry weapons. These unarmed people have done no less, and maybe more, for the development of new lands. Even when they became «citizens» after the revolutions, they would have used weapons, but they mastered a different weapon. I don’t mean religious missionaries. Go to any market where, without any violence, by mutual consent, that is, completely voluntarily, you will give your money for nothing. Any mini market «resident» will visually show how all the new invaders acted before him.

So, all modern states were created based on a strategic treaty. This is not an elite contract because, before, everything was kept in balance by the aristocracy. The bourgeoisie, and we are talking about them when we mention the unarmed diplomats who seized this world — modern states have taken shape at the expense of world trade. The alliance was made up of small people, completely small and insignificant from a position of strength; they are also small bourgeois — there have always been a lot of them, and now they are the main planetary contingent. Without the strategic partnership of the «petty nobodies», not a single seizure of Indians, Africans, Asians, and other savage territories in the opinion of these racists and chauvinists would have taken place. Asia is still trying to establish strategic alliances with the market nobodies. Still, nothing is working for the modern Asian elites (With the exception, perhaps, of Japan. But democracy for Japan is the path to destruction because it was through democracy that Japan lost the samurai spirit). All these elites, falling into bondage with the 7th-8th generation of bourgeois nobodies, begin to declare «commitment to democratic choice.» Of course, it is possible to convict these elites of their plebeianism because many former Soviet Asian elites took place thanks to socialist revolutions (which were not invented by Asians at all. Socialism has raised the social bottom to a height. The children of the «working people» who «amazingly» turned out to be ungrateful because they all abandoned socialism; that is, they betrayed socialism when they achieved power and money.

Chapter 6

Kazakh Bolivar

Why is there a discrepancy between Asians and democracy?

The word bourgeoisie in Asia is entirely inappropriate in the common sense of usage, as this word is used worldwide because the bourgeoisie got its name in London and Paris, and not in Nanjing or Dhaka. No one has ever thought about equality in a strictly class environment, especially with the elite. So it was in Egypt since the time of the Pharaohs, so it was everywhere where the landed aristocracy was noticed (the landed aristocracy was everywhere). For example, in Japan, the bourgeoisie was the most despicable class until the Meiji era. The aristocrats of Japan themselves raised their peddlers of nonentities for guidance so that they were motivated: «If these nonentities won in Europe, maybe we will be lucky» (in the same spirit, Kazakhs call children by the names of other peoples to deceive the spirits. Japanese and Kazakhs are very similar in pagan animism, and they copied the West fanatically because they copied some incomprehensible force). Before Japan, Europeans colonized all of Asia. Where did they get their power from? That’s what the frightened Japanese were interested in.

In Asia, everything was decided and decided by the elite — I ask everyone to remember this. Allied detachments, as opposed to some third forces, were considered partners. Another partnership is not possible. The strategic alliance extends only to blood ties through dynastic marriages (modern marriages of children of Kazakh officials and oligarchs are proof of this. We are Kazakhs, «yes, we are Scythians…", we wanted to sneeze at the modernization of Russians and Communists. Self-reflection cannot be deceived). Only a strategic partnership at the blood level, so that if you glue the two tops together, you get a horde against a third party. This can explain the fragility of the so-called states of the same nomads as in the past and now. Why nomads? Yes, because the nomads have full ambitions until now. (We are belligerent, close in energy to the Highlanders, northern American Indians). Yes, because the nomadic states, like the medieval feudal lords of Europe, had a fluidity because there was a specific leader, a bright leader (an outstanding personality — in different places with different common names). As a tribute, his colleagues tried to support his sons, and the sons tried to continue their father’s work — little turned out. The hereditary system was preserved, monarchical dynasties appeared somewhere, and the sons could do nothing. Attila’s empire collapsed immediately after the death of its founder because Attila’s sons quarreled and fought. A barbaric partnership is impossible without subordination, without hierarchy because «Bolivar can’t stand two..» If two candidates appear, even several — this is an emergency for us. It follows from this: brutal, pagan, feudal-monarchical, Asian-traditional partnership is possible only at the top among the elite. And this is not a partnership but subordinated in a rigid hierarchy of its members. Nomadic so-called states cannot be called states in the European sense of the word. All the settled peoples of the so-called farmers could cooperate at the lowest level; the cooperation of the peasants went beyond one family — from the cultivation of the field to the cooperation of the whole people in the battles for harvests. Of course, there is still a Cosa Nostra in Sicily and a Camorra in Naples as indicators of family life. However, this is the south, and the proximity of clan Africa is also affected. Italy is an exception. Italy — until then, it was European Asia, informally. Accept at least a thousand laws in Asia, where clan «legislation» rules, these official laws will not work. Attempts by nomads to imitate China with the involvement of Chinese officials did not work. Only in the Khan’s bet did it work. (Kazakhs, too, are mostly guided by the informal laws of tradition; only the market element has involved all sorts of lawyers and other rascals.) Now, I want to ask the most honest descendants of the steppe people: what kind of state can there be if the people are guided not by Khan’s laws but by informal law? If people ignore the laws invented by the bourgeoisie in the name of bourgeois property. Kazakhs have never had property in the European sense of property. Kazakhs had everything in common; at least, it was considered common, even after the property distinction. What kind of states did the nomads have, all the nomads, even the blue Turks? It was a horde where the elite spread their power to keep everyone or to show that these people were protected. Kazakhs are still not ready for a strategic partnership, except for the same blood unions — dynastic marriages of the elite. A beggar Kazakh will always imitate a rich Kazakh. Is this a strange thing? No. To conditionally group the beggars, they must turn into an elite. Having become rich, they will be grouped only by dynastic unions, having outlived their elite children. That’s where the Kazakh «state» actually lives. For the Kazakh to group with the Kazakh on an ideological basis, a million Kazakhs must migrate sharply from villages to cities and meet market laws there in all the cynicism of their non-necessity and mockery. Corruption is a mockery not only of officials over the European tracing paper of the state in the form of a union of trading, very greedy nobodies with low taste and needs, accompanying these people throughout history. The Union of Kazakh Nationalists is exciting, one might say a rattling union of the impossible. People who are incapable of strategic partnership due to personal ambitions and cultural individualism should unite sometime (in theory). However, no one has seen this union yet because «Bolivar can’t take two.» Therefore, a nationalist party is impossible because of an unclear leadership criterion. Only in the form of force majeure, for a short period of the eruption of Mount Fuji, when the enemy of my enemy is my friend, and the prey is close, and everyone sees it. No strategic partnership in Asia has been possible until today. Do not look at the declarations of Asian elites. Even Chinese Communists have their party nobility. But the Han Chinese are not nomads. Moreover, the nomads are always scattered; they call it natural separatism freedom because of intrinsic nomad anarchy; such people are ready to break any association, especially the state.

Chapter 7

Where did the Kazakh bourgeois come from

Why Kazakhs will never build democracy is just dancing with property. Kazakhs will always resemble the Mongolian army.

There are objective practices for the emergence of the bourgeoisie.

Conservative communities do not welcome the movement. The bourgeoisie appeared just from the movement of extra people because, in every traditional family, ten children are born. Not necessarily every tenth of a litter of many children, — having many children as a condition, as a guarantee of escape of folk: many bourgeois descendants appeared in the cities from landlessness, that is, from poverty, will be bourgeo.

In order for people to understand the need for cooperation, they had to live in a peasant community themselves. Both in rural areas and in cities, cooperation was a guarantee of survival. So in Europe, workshops appeared in medieval cities. Why couldn't Kazakhs create workshops? Why did the Kazakhs need them? Kazakhs didn't need them.

Who among the Kazakhs, in general, could be the first to turn into the bourgeoisie, given that the Kazakhs did not like money? Like all peoples of the tradition, the Kazakhs loved glory. That’s just out of love for status and contempt for the worthless; however, this feeling is familiar to the whole world; to all peoples, so Kazakhs, appeared as candidates for the bourgeoisie according to the Western type of maturation. Suppose the nomads did not like cities where strategic cooperation with the Kazakhs could occur. We need to find the reason for the Kazakh cooperation without relation to the main Kazakh attribute — belonging to the Kazakh clan (ru). Poverty and rootlessness are the two main bourgeois assets. All the beggars and the rootless want to become famous so that they are still respected; it is a fact.

If we remove the upper cooperation (in the Revcon, this is called the upper dubbing when another elite duplicates the elite of the people, necessary for creating a bourgeois class. No modernization is possible without the solidarity of former beggars who have become oligarchs. To create an industry, it is not nomadic; no other primitive and feudal elite is needed. All this traditional old elite should disappear. As practice shows, the primitive elite is destroyed by the new people themselves «in the name of progress.» None of these people will change old habits. I’m talking about the personal egoism of the feudal elite, about reforms — changing the stereotype of the behavior of the whole people is out of the question. For new people to appear, a crowd of rootless people must appear when people do not remember their relatives. If people remember the past kind, so only external intervention is possible — this is an exterior double of self-reflection when representatives of other peoples act as teachers), or you can immediately get into the prosak. Yes, these reform teachers are destroying the selfish feudal local elite in the name of progress. The versions that the primitive elites themselves will go to voluntary poverty to turn into the bourgeoisie seem to be seditious, devilry, and market demagogy. Japanese samurai would never agree to trade to retain power. Those who claim that the Kazakh primitive elite would have shown miracles of selflessness in the name of the people would have led reforms, that is, ruined themselves and butchered themselves to the head to look like beggars; for this, the people themselves had to take place, that is, a crowd of rootless scoundrels demanding for self a couple of hundred sheep from them. The bourgeoisie is formed from dirt and shit. From dirt, from conservative shit! This dirt and shit should be eaten by all future oligarchs, as the most unscrupulous people for tradition.

Zhataks (recumbent men) — poor Kazakhs, weeded out by Kazakh relatives for their inability to maintain movement — could be the first to render in a foreign environment and in foreign cities; fate itself gives a chance to such all the poor. If they did not feel alienated from exactly the same generic dregs, some despicable Sarts should have felt contempt for the same Kazakhs from other clans instead of being ready to cooperate. (Kazakhs do not let strangers, that is, not relatives of Kazakhs, into the Nauryz pagan holiday yurt even now! And they stuttered about the Kazakh strategic cooperation. This is an absent Kazakh feeling) It is they who could establish cooperation. If not for one thing, it is precisely that the Kazakhs all remember their kinds. With this memory, they build their modern power. And at the same time, they walk with the illusion that it is possible to build democracy simultaneously. What each Kazakh has under democracy is a separate topic. And this topic does not go far from the Kazakh self-reflection.

Chapter 8

Why did the American Indians lose? The Path of Big Wings

There are notes from Columbus about the meeting of Indians with Europeans. There, he described them as resembling children. This is true, including in the matter of strategic cooperation. An Indian of any age is not authorized to meet an enemy or relative, but people whose strategic cooperation literally replaces the smell of blood: if their blood, if this man is their tribe, that man is a friend; if not their blood, it is a member of another tribe. If the same Indians had been in the place of Columbus’ sailors, the first Indians might have eaten them. As it was, their curiosity kept Columbus alive, and he saw not children but unauthorized Indians for such meetings.

When the settlers who arrived from the Atlantic created settlement agglomerations for several generations, they penetrated the American continent deep. The Indians showed their inferiority and complete incompetence. Apart from guerrilla tactics, they had nothing to oppose the white people. Of course, they created tribal alliances, but this was not enough for a strategic confrontation. White people surpassed the Aborigines not only in weapons and tactics but, most importantly, the whites could cooperate based on the small interests of the small owners. The great Indian myths could not help them in any way because the Indians were incapable of cooperation or joint actions, except for the «warpath» based on the interest of blood. Without the most extreme need, the tribes cannot cooperate in order for the Zerefs to have a strategic friendship — this is only when there is a war and when on the edge of the abyss. In other cases, the Zerefs will look at you too long to come forward or trample you. All other meetings of the Zerefs outside their ancestral villages are meetings of warriors and knight riders — a meeting of two wolves rather than jackals. This policy is maintained until the very last moment. (When a Kazakh looks at a Kazakh, he does not just look at the «knight»; he is a «cozben atady» (shoots with his eyes). Most likely, the Indians also looked at each other with heavy eyes without blinking at a chance meeting, creating a heavy look).

The Indian elite, Indian leaders, and Indian shamans also could not do anything and could not help their people in any way. The fate of the Indians was sad. Too many tribes — too many «states.» They were with the elite, who were also incapable of a strategic agreement. Let savages go the way of heroes, and all tribes follow the path of tribal glory; no conservative people at the stage of «naturals» can survive if they are surrounded by small people who can win without blood, without a fight — just by selling and buying. People came to the Indians who could unite for small gains and create punitive detachments. From the particular to the general. This is what distinguishes the petty bourgeois (Zere, Refags) from the generally wild people who shoot at each other all the time with their eyes. The «path of heroes,» the «path of glory,» which distinguishes all conservative peoples, dooms such an elite to death in the first place. These people would never have adapted to the «white» trick. Most people have to die after their elite because, apart from curiosity and complexes, after realizing their impotence, these people are incapable of anything. This is the fatal tax of all conservative peoples until the savages assimilate the first skills of cooperation except kinship, except blood. This means that the entire older generation of the «curious» should also have gone to the valley of death; all barbarians are very persistent and stupidly stubborn when they try to retrain themselves, even with the help of violence. The colonizers even had to import Negroes from faraway Africa to the plantations. By the way, African leaders sold young, physically strong people to them.

So. During a storm, swifts with medium wings survive. The wind carries away those who have wings that are too big; those with short wings themselves fall to the ground and break. So, to assimilate the Tatar tribe, Genghis Khan executed all adults, leaving only children who could pass under the cart.

Chapter 9

Top dubbing

My books are not voluminous — a maximum of 200 pages. The main idea can be said in one chapter. But this will not give understanding, so the «understanding» stretches to 120 pages. The remaining 80 pages remain in reserve — for new discoveries on the topic.

Three books have been selected for the manual so far: «Kazakhs and Arabs,» «Kazakhs and Japanese,» and Kazakhs and Turks,» because Arabs, Japanese, and Turks are successful nations today. (Which cannot be said about the Kazakhs yet). Arabs, Japanese, and Turks have their own history, their own way, and their own choice; these three nations are chosen to show where we are. Ordinary people don’t like difficult situations. Therefore, instead of a complex «self-reflection», a mirror no one wants to look into, another tactic was chosen — looking at yourself against the background of successful Arabs, Japanese, and Turks. Why do they succeed in the end, but the Kazakhs do not? If Confucius said, «If it seems to you that the goal is unattainable, do not change the goal — change your plan of action» — this is just right. Tactics have changed, but the strategy remains.

The main argument of the Kazakh nationalists: «If it were not for the Russians, if it were not for the Bolsheviks, we, the Kazakhs, would be at a high level.» A lot of biased material has appeared. It is populism. Betting on arguments that contradict the facts is always the way to nowhere. «Fanatics can seize power. But they will never hold the victory. From fanaticism get tired» first of all, the audience gets tired, to whom fanatics prepare the fate of sacrificial sheep. It is enough to look at the speech of patriots in the parliament of one belligerent republic of the former USSR. No one listens to anyone there. But everyone comes to the podium and spews patriotic mantras and curses. Patriotic mantras and curses have already led these people to war, but spewing mantras and curses in 404 is a very profitable occupation. These parliamentarians themselves live happily ever after. At this very time, the people wash themselves, as they say, with blood. Why is there so much cynicism in 404? Why did we, the Kazakhs, lag behind them? Is it good, or is it bad? Our «backwardness», more precisely, our conservatism and «shukur» save us.

To not repeat the state of Ukraine’s path under top scammers’ leadership, you need a little honesty and logic. It would be best to look a little in the mirror of facts.

Revcon has the concept of upper and lower dubbing.

Lower dubbing is when people with low status and reflection perform the tasks of noble people. For example, the communist ideology proclaimed the dictatorship of the proletariat. The proletarians began to play the role of the aristocracy. Kazakhs are not interested in what came out of it. The supposed Kazakh reaction will be this: we had our elite. If the Alash elite had been preserved, we would have lived at the Japanese level. The Russian Bolsheviks prevented us. But is it so?

As we can see, the whole fate of the people rests on the concept of the elite.

Arabs, Japanese, and Turks have preserved Arab, Japanese, and Turkish — generally, their elite. Kazakhs did not rule Kazakhs. Although for 30 years, Kazakhs have been ruled by Kazakhs, and the results are medieval against the background of modern technologies. There is no gap beyond the words «kazaksha soyle» (you must speaking by kazakh). In addition to mineral resources, Kazakhs have put singers and boxers on the world market (now even a chess player lady has appeared).

Although the current regime continues the tactics of a low double, it recruits managers «from the people,» who, as they say, are «still there.» There can be no other way. A low double was always at hand for conservative dictatorships. It was the Communists who brought the conservative double to the level of holy dirt (although this has nothing to do with the Communists, Marxism itself, the Marxists themselves treated the tradition arrogantly, but the ideology of Marxism itself is a pure lower dubbing).

In all regimes before communism and before the 20th century, all traditional elites used a below double to create assistants for themselves without violating the current hierarchy. The feudal lords could choose from the people and protect the most talented children of commoners. Commoners understood that they were commoners and did not infringe on conservative orders.

What is the difference between a high dubbing and a low one with the general similarity of the procedure.

With a high dubbing, the initiative comes from above; the feudal lords select oprichniks and officials, and with low double, conditional slaves sweep away the system. A people from the bottom, from low double, will always be weak and flawed because it has nothing but primitive material desires. These are the same fanatics as Zeref’s. (Look around. Who shouts «kazaksha soyle» (speake by Kazakh) the most? These people want a good take to replace professionals in all spheres, to amuse their self-esteem, and to enrich themselves, but this is not beneficial to the Kazakh people themselves) The conservative people after the revolution, that is, after the bifurcation, will still return to the upper dubbing. So, Russian communism ended with Stalin and his people. Very mediocre people — all the older children of Russian peasants turned into the red elite. Still, they never got rid of the inferiority complex: they carried their dirt in genetics until they abolished all red hypocrisy in 1991. Low dubbing is always a failure of people’s memory and practice. It’s just timelessness and the absence of a real natural elite. Who feeds the modern fanatics and scammers so that they scream the loudest? Yes, we should never forget: if you don’t see the elite at home, your elite, then someone else’s external elite is working. This external elite will support the lower dubbing of the aul revolutionaries to destroy the people, in any case, for a long time to take all the resources till all are admiring the Kazakh singers boxers to the cheers of the narrow-minded philistines because non-professionals will always carry inferiority complexes, but at the same time they will always shout the loudest)

So.

The upper double is the most basic in human practice because the rabble never had the knowledge of priests, and in general, the egg did not teach the chicken.

Of the Japanese, Arabs and Turks, it is the Turks who have kept their double the most, so they have the best prospects.

The upper double is divided under external indirect control. This is when the elite seems to be national, but it is controlled from outside, at least by economic and financial laws. Outwardly successful Saudis fall into this canvas. The Saudis are thriving because no one has shot Arab princes. This prosperity of the Emirates drives the Kazakhs to long for their pre-revolutionary bais (feodal rich men). I repeat, with a low red dubbing, the feudal elite is not able to survive because this is a revolution, a popular uprising (and no rich Kazakh is willing to voluntarily give a place of honor to another Kazakh even now. Kazakhs do not have strategic cooperation because of this. Every Kazakh sells and buys everything now. Yes, modern Kazakhs are now repeating Western practices. But any new rich «Kazakh» from the mud will behave exactly like his predecessor — Kazakh feodal buy. This indicates a persistent, low, tribal reflection. Any modern Kazakh can be thrown into the past, and he will not be lost there, and vice versa: any Kazakh from the past can be thrown into our time and changed — no one will notice the substitution. Kazakhs with a lag of 500 years are identical cultural twins. And this even though the Bolsheviks educated three generations of Kazakhs).

Despite the Japanese miracle, the Japanese are also in a state of grogginess. Kazakhs would dream of reaching the level of the Japanese. Still, the Kazakhs did not even pass the Japanese stage of Kamakura and Muromachi: this is when the Japanese samurai got tired of their slaughter and recognized the shogun’s power. Kazakh philistines are so fucked up that they want democracy right away… Even though every Kazakh is the same Kazakh from the 500-year-old past, overflowing with ambitions and not wanting strategic cooperation, that is, not having a high reflection.

Chapter 10

Turks and Kazakhs

In 545, the union of tribes that came out of Altai defeated the people of the Zhuzhans, their patrons, and ten years later they captured Sogd. In 575, the Göktürks, we are talking about the Turkics, already controlled the Northern Black Sea region, the Crimea, and the North Caucasus; that is, in 30 years, the Göktürks passed and began to control the entire steppe zone from the Crimea to Manchuria. How could this happen? The seizure of territories so unimaginable in size in such a short period. In 555, that is, ten years after they left the Altai, they had already reached the Volga and controlled Transoxiana. Yes, the Göktürks forged iron for the Zhuzhans. But this is not the most important thing. Iron has nothing to do with it. They defeated the Ephthalites, that is, the ancestors of those very Parthian cataphractaries.

Since the 6th century, the displacement of the Iranian root from the entire steppe and its replacement with the Turkic one began. No one can explain why the ancient Iranian nomads ceded the steppe to the Turks. Since then, many Iranians have renounced and continued the glory of the Iranian conquerors under the name of Oghuz. Under the name of the Seljuks, the former Iranians created the «South Asian way» towards Europe — not as fast as the Turkites, but in 500 years, they reached Vienna under the name of the Ottomans. What happened to the ancient Iranians was that they gave way to the Turks; moreover, they renounced so much that they fought with other descendants of the Aryans in Iran and Azerbaijan. These ancient Iranians were known to the world by names such as Saks, Massagets, and Sarmatians. These ancient Iranians also lived in the Turfan oasis on the rights of the indigenous inhabitants. The modern descendants of these ancient Iranians, the Uighurs, will not let you lie. But the Uighurs also speak the Turkic language. After all, the ancient Iranians were known to the ancient Chinese under the name Yueji. How many descendants of ancient Iranians turned into Turks — millions!

All these tribes of ancient Iranians spoke different dialects of the Proto-Iranian language. But these ancient Iranians fought with each other, like the Mongols before Genghis Khan, like Kazakh tribes before the arrival of the Russians, but the Mongolian and Kazakh eternal showdowns are pathetic copies of the ancient Iranian thousand-year showdowns (the Mongols, by the way, could not impose the Mongolian language on the conquered world, although they followed the same route). What can I say: the worst enemies, Cyrus of Persia and the queen of the Massagets Tomiris in 530 BC, could talk to each other, most likely without translators. The Parthians took power from the Persians in Central Asia. The antagonism between Iran and Turan is not an Iranian-Turkic antagonism. These ancient Iranians fought with each other for a thousand years. Today, only Shiite Iran is the heir of all the once glorious ancient Iranians, bringing diversity to the motley Islamic world. What happened to the ancient Iranians that they turned into Turks and changed their faith?

There is a whole complex of reasons for this historical defeat of the ancient Iranians. But the most important reason is the inability to cooperate strategically. All people with a tribal code, not even a culture, cannot cooperate strategically. To put it even more simply, hostility at the level of one’s small piece of land, a local territory that has received a pathetic extension called homeland. For worms, the shit is housing, for whom, and the swamp is the place of birth. But the inhabitants of one village can challenge the inhabitants of a neighboring village to a fistfight — there was such fun in Russia. In Soviet cities, it was fraught for young people to walk through a strange area. The bloody showdowns of teenage gang fights are copies of Zeref’s reflection. Here, the «protected area» is only an excuse to demonstrate the power. Before Genghis Khan’s activity, the Mongols attacked and slaughtered each other. The Merkits took Genghis Khan’s wife after the raid. Then he returned her with the help of Anda Jamukha with a «Merkit gift,» so his first son Jochi was always called that behind his back.

In the middle of the 6th century, the Turkits passed these steppes in ten years simply because the whole steppe was a sparsely populated territory. This is a territory drained of simple living conditions. No one needs it except nomads (without the arrival of any civilizers, other people can populate no steppes, and the people who lead a nomadic economy will never refuse to do something else: they will be stubborn, they will run the old economy — they will remain in exactly the in a same number of the warriors — combatant. Without the arrival of «colonialists,» the men with a culture of trade, the traditional people cannot grow from the past conventional world in any way because new technologies are needed, especially new thinking and the ability to strategic cooperation. Therefore, all reformers apply radical measures of «re-education». Nomadic people, especially the tribal elite of nomads, will never abandon the «wills of their ancestors.») One skirmish with the Eftalites was enough for turkeys to disperse the other tribes into corners.

Ten years later, the Turkits began fighting over the inheritance because tribal thinking is the eternal ambition of the discontented (The first to rise was the rootless Apa Khan Temeren, the rootless son of a concubine. It was only with the help of the Chinese that the uprising was suppressed). But by 603, the Turkic ale, the empire of the Turks, had been divided into Western and Eastern khaganates. In 744, the Eastern Khaganate fell under the onslaught of the Uighurs. How long, it turns out, did the Turks dominate? Almost 200 years. But the Uighurs themselves already spoke the Turkic language. And the entire Iranian Maveronnahr spoke the Turkic language. Deep cultural reforms have taken place over 200 years. (Before the Tokugawa Shogunate, the ancient inhabitants of Hokkaido, the Ainu had a European appearance. Tokugawa Izyasu ordered the Ainu to be settled throughout Japan. Modern Ainu looks no different from the Japanese. But the residents of Bukhara, Khorezm, and Samarkand still resemble Iranians. But they speak the Turkic language because the inhabitants of the Chagatai ulus were not forcibly resettled anywhere, and the Mongols were not imported.

Interestingly, most modern Kyrgyz have Aryan R1a but look like Mongols. Did the ancient Iranians marry Mongolian women? When did this happen? This is not a question on our topic)

PS. When I ask a Kazakh to take my book, do I have nothing to do? No, I have something to show. I need to show Kazakh ambitions. Even the poorest, most insignificant Kazakh has them. I need to indicate an inability to cooperate strategically. Kazakhs are solidifying so far at the family level. Even in business, the first thought of a Kazakh is to please his family and himself, to show success to his relatives. Hence, all the show-offs. None of the «guests» notice the friendship of the Kazakhs. And they use it well. For Kazakhs, disassembly among themselves is more important. When a dignitary Kazakh is in power and has access to a feeder, he will not greet a dissident. When a dignitary Kazakh is removed from office, he even hugs you. But if the Kazakh is brought back to power again, he will similarly behave arrogantly, again pretending that he does not know you — no matter what happens.

Chapter 11

The strength of blood and the weakness of strength

The inability to strategic cooperation pursued all the peoples of the blood, including those who lived up to world democracy, or with the most extreme new hypocrisy like of the folks of money. There were moments when the peoples of blood, especially in the form of nomads, created world history. As a rule, nature was to blame for everything. (When the people of the blood are well, that is, satisfying, they are incapable of anything. Just about this time, the talkers of modernity like to rant: nomads, they say, contemplators of nature, such total democrats, who do not offend any divine creature. No. Just the nomads were fierce beasts. They even hated each other — raided, robbed, killed. Ashin’s men beat the Yuejas. Yuezhi renounced and turned into Chateau Turks, that is, Oguzes. The Oguzes engaged in the genocide of the same Oguzes, known in Russia as the Pechenegs. Another tribe of Turks, from the abandoned tribes, under the name of Cumans -Cumans, engaged in the genocide of the Pechenegs until they were utterly overtaken and destroyed. After the Pechenegs, it was the turn of the Cumans — Kipchaks themselves.

The Mongols (apparently also Turks) of Genghis Khan drove the Kipchaks to Pannonia. There are thousands of such examples. Everywhere, even in Eurasia, even in South and North America, and even in modern Africa, there is always some Bhutus who cut Tutsis). And this is always explained by the inability of the peoples of the blood to coexist otherwise than by blood. (The Romans could not defend themselves from the hordes of Attila; too large an area would have to be fenced off like the Great Wall of China. But all de against the Picts they built their ramparts in Britain). And if peoples live by blood, that is, by kinship, then they are a priori not capable of a long peace, according to Revcon, it means strategic cooperation (even easier, such people do not trust, dislike, compete, and envy).

Civilization adjusts this communication as a derivative of a long history and an extended policy. People of blood live quietly and peacefully for the time being. Civilizational mechanisms restrict tribal people from conflicts and inhibit them from genetic outbreaks — these people seem to be floating in the mainstream of events with their hands tied. But people of blood and kinship still do not want to cooperate; they prefer to communicate with relatives and not only perform rituals, including at the highest level — at the state level. You should understand that if people remember their families, it means they are incapable of state management; that is, they will not pick up talents; they will pick up the most talented relatives, and this narrows the base of the nation (let’s call a similar illusion floating in the channel that way because there are no other names. They’ll tell me, are we the only ones? Yes, you’re right. You are not alone; many similar peoples and states live by the voice of blood with a gag of civilization in their mouths. Yes, what can I say? The Japanese drew the emblems of their company on kimonos, and Japanese firms were created according to the clan-family principle — they imitate the samurai tradition. There used to be family hieroglyphs on the kimono. There is a Kazakh habit of not noticing or passing by if this Kazakh is an official or the editor feeds the family on the trust of the authorities. And our power is also tied to the family. The family state in our country is not figurative but literal. We all walk around with the gags of civilization and squint our eyes, narrow them, smile, and throw dirt behind our eyes. If you are outside the Horde, you are dangerous for… to one family’s prosperity. Every Kazakh in a European costume is, therefore, comical if you look at his translational fluorography — not external, everything is fine with the costume and gait, but hidden, invisible. Thus, everything falls into place).

These are the rudiments of a consanguineous world when everyone was equal. There was no early feudal dictate of property on relationships yet. This will eventually develop the feudal dictate of the elite. But it won’t be just the voice of blood anymore. The voice of blood will have to go around the land hills. The feudal dictatorship is already the dictate of the land, not blood in its purest form. All the people engaged in agriculture quickly moved to such cooperation between the elite and the common people. They made their way into the traditional elite, into the aristocracy by talents. Nobility in the form of constancy of actions — the actions of several dynasty members are required for the family’s «handwriting.» A settled system can include as many options for cooperation as possible, including the voice of blood, but in this case, the blood constantly cools down. The logical constructions of the cold mind begin to impose the first node on the blood. When necessary, the principle of kinship is included, mainly for the political purposes of the strategy. The feudal society differs from the vicious one in that the elite assumes strategic cooperation. All unions begin to take shape in the form of dynastic marriages (A simple person thinks that shezhire protects against incest so that the people consist of healthy warriors — this is a stereotype of the common people). Dynastic marriages are necessary for long-term power. (If you see a «blind,» that is, a hypocrite savage editor passing by, he also adheres to this line. He cannot and is not capable of strategic cooperation. Therefore, the entire information strategy in such a world is supported by people of the philosophy of culture of money. They love such situations, and of course, no one has canceled the money yet).

But why did the nomads «chase» all the farmers, starting from the farmers of the Nile Valley and ending with the Yuezhs of Sogd? For the joy of stupid patriots. And this is even though the culture of money is dominant today, using all the stupid cries for controlled chaos.

Glossary:

Revcon — the ideology of revolutionary conservatism, necessary for radical reforms of traditional society

shezhire — list of seven tribes of ancestors of each Kazakh clan.

Chapter 12

Free riders are still riding

It is tough to rise, to break into leaders or the elite in a society of people with a thin cortex, and that’s why. It is in the cortex, and that’s why all the connections and the memory of actions are formed — in the human brain, in the cerebral cortex, there is a socialization of the entire experience.

A tribal society is a community of equally envious «communists» watching each other. No wonder (the Communists of the Stalin system followed it and created arbitrariness — these are genes, not an idea). Because of the primitive of such communism, each of the «equals» was on his mind; this affected the fate of official communism, which officially disappeared in 1991 (they are still on their mind: someone in memory of Soviet communism performs well — these are artists, such as the Communist Party In Russia, and the so-called The Kazakh People’s Party. Who else? They think of themselves as leaders-activists in social networks, although they should shut up and look for the best and not offer themselves as weak. Idiots, calm down!) if you are seen as an equal, no one will allow you to be at the top. If you are not equal among your peers, you just won’t be forgiven for it. You don’t even need a contract of equals to do this. There are still such «equals»; there are many of them. This equality is absolutely immaterial. This equality of the soul echoes primitive equality and rivalry simultaneously. Now, it is still the greedy equality of the savages of democracy, but no one knows about it. Everyone knows that traditional people love the humble, that’s all. All conservative peoples have atavisms of primitive communism, and modesty is its daughter. This daughter is now being used in a brothel with the sign «Democracy.» But, almost all conservative nations in the person of the representative persons of the elite do not seem to notice this. And where the official elite goes, the whole herd goes. In fact, this egoism of savages is actively used by the so-called democracy when the habits of savages and savage hacks are taken under control. But savages — absolutely literate today, absolutely consciously — voluntarily go into bondage, like the same Indians who did not know what kind of beads the Columbus sailors gave them… Obeying their instincts, the elite hid a lot of money — part of the common spoils of the whole people: no one will forgive them for this betrayal. Although, perhaps, at this moment, people are fawning over this government, which means they want to get something else. The fact that it is easy to take savages through the bribery of elites has long become clear. But before that, these elites achieved their elevation. The very height — where envy, jealousy, and the stones no longer reach. Stones will fly to corrupt officials later. This guaranteed curse has been retroactively recorded more than once by events. Civilization and democracy have made savages weak.

If these elites have achieved their indisputability, this is another stage.

These same conservative people have strict rules of hierarchy. Hierarchy restrains the natural egoism, anarchy, freedom, and pseudo-communism of every savage. Savages could not forgive each other’s talents; civilization had taught them that. But before that, jealousy and envy were controlled only by the Asian dictatorship. Dictators or feudal elites have taken all instincts under control. Democracy accuses savages today that they have not fully revealed themselves, that they are ashamed of their inner forces in order not to be shy and throw off their rulers. The financiers of the World Bank tell them: "You are personalities (really they say them you are savages)! Free yourself from your elite, from autocracy" — so they are being told from across the ocean, and Soros’ people, who receive money from Soros funds, agree like parrots and monkeys. But this means that primitive communism is coming again, jealousy and envy of all against all, that is, civil war. Conservative people do not need to be taught; they are so «personalities by nature,» free personalities, each by himself, free riders — not knowing that people of money will come up with this for themselves. But people of money are people of deep strategy among a similar rabble. These tradesmen have learned to create workshops, unions, unions of entrepreneurs, etc. You don’t have to do anything, and you are a person! Just trade. Before appearing as a modern world mafia, an international force, the Refags went a long way in the community, that is, the friendship of the rootless and hungry in the slums of vagrants and in the garbage streets, who learned to be friends with a distant goal, which they did not know about then. These vagabonds today control genetic warriors who continue their feud. These people, in the form of financiers, control the whole world. There are still islands of conservative resistance.

Then, we can say that all nomads are individuals without money. Just were wild people without money. They don’t like it when an equal outranks them on an invisible horse. They know who is who among themselves. This is the primal pride of jerks, which does not allow the cortex to thicken and does not allow the creation of alliances, except for dynasties, except for the contract of the elite. It does not give a reason for strategic cooperation except for warfighting. It is necessary to jump to the top so that the envy and the running boards of the brothers — friends of the «savages» could no longer reach to them. It’s pointless to shit to anybody  if you can’t get results. This is a human expectation, and an eternal one, that «Akela will old.» the materialist theory explains the appearance of classes, in our case, the landed aristocracy, the growth of technology and technology, and the appearance of surpluses. This violates the primal harmony of equality, the attraction of blood, egoism, and the anarchy of horsemen. If I’m not the first, you won’t be either! So unconsciously, all the savages of the world still think, but they do not know about these secrets of their souls; they do it. Every conservative nation has its way. How they got gagged, how their hands were tied, each such person has its scores with civilization.

The aristocracy is separated from relatives, so it is separated from the guardianship and egoism of equal zerefs. The aristocracy has taught conditionally related «hyenas» for a long time that there can be no former equality. It takes on the function of noble control, if necessary, provides, makes allowances, frees poor relatives, and takes on the function of patrons. (It is still possible to observe the release of the law of the «lord’s shoulder» and other benefits on behalf of some local leaders; this line is repeated by more minor government officials, who, they say, decided they grant the benefits for the poor). Thank you, my dears. I’ve had enough of equality, so I’ve had enough of the accompanying jealousy. From now on, I’m not unequal to you; get used to it. I’m an aristocrat, and I’m taller than you, freaks. The word freaks does not sound at this moment, but every dictator works as if he curses everyone and takes revenge. That’s what it is, not the surplus an iron plow obtains. Although formally, it is the iron plow that is guilty — it has strengthened, strengthened the sense of superiority. There is no turning back.

Chapter 13

How the Seljuk Turks appeared on the historical scene

If brothers by faith replace brothers by blood, what’s important about it?

The inability to form a strategic alliance (a permanent marker of savages) is not always a bad thing. History knows many such savage victories. (The savage who was behind can outrun any cultured smartass even now. This is a frequent occurrence. But the conservatives themselves lose from this). This requires favorable conditions. But for this, firstly, the system’s collapse is needed when problems in any state and even in the empire escalate. The invasion of the mass of savages may look treacherous as if the vultures feel the decomposition of the «corpse.» That’s not so. This does not mean that the savages did not have problems either. At this moment, the whole planet is covered with problems (at the same time, if I may say so, the situation of the global crisis is not only modernity, it has always been like this, but then there was no globality to make a clear picture out of chaos). In the state, everything is much more complicated. Nomads depended on nature, any jute (when not the steppe fodder for cattle), and end-nomads attacked neighbors. At this moment, all the conditional neighboring savages have no fewer problems — it’s not interesting to anyone. So, where are they to go? They go to the empire! Oh, how scary to us! But hunger is not a kind aunt. Thus, the Hyksos came to the Egyptians and captured Egypt of the XII dynasty — this is perhaps the first case of the nomads’ luck. Then the Visigoths entered Near Asia, the province of Rome — this is the second significant case — de facto, the collapse of the Roman Empire began. The Roman Empire is no joke. However, it was the barbarians who made the onslaught. Further-more).

What is the difference between the problems among the «brothers» and among the aristocracy? The crisis in the empire is usually associated with elite showdowns, and the brothers fight just like that (somewhere in the ass of them, it boiled over — it started playing, and the brothers fought — the usual savage case). In the early feudal state, even great empires perished under the blows of tribal unions, including nomads, which created a precedent for the «greatness» of the barbarians. This plays into the hands of modern nationalists: they say we were so great, we took Rome in the past. No one is interested in the reasons. The reasons for the superiority of a friendly gang of robbers over the gentlemen. That all barbarians have to go exactly the same way from barbarism to civilization is no longer interesting to anyone. The main thing is to tickle your complexes and your own vanity).

As we already know, not only the early feudal states but also later communities are attempts by some of the «brothers» to prove that they are far from the brotherhood, have cooled down from kinship feelings; therefore, they are fed up with envy and jealousy of their fellow tribesmen, that they are now not brothers, but they are an aristocracy now and a privileged stratum. There is only one remedy against this — to rise above the clan, above the people (all the leaders, even the modern Elbasy, still do this; this is not trivia for us, the zeref’s reflection has been ruling for 5000 years). Suppose strategic diplomacy appears in the form of dynastic marriages. In that case, this is already the handwriting of the aristocracy (in any form of manifestation, if we want to create a planetary elite today — A.B.) It’s better to let equal envy and be jealous of your equal, although it’s not so vile.

The crisis in a blood-related family turns into domestic fights. In the empire, it is a war of a co-organized army fighting by the method of science.

The crisis in the empire is a battle of equals, a showdown within the elite, for it is not always the aristocracy that can prove its rights to power. For example, there were the most gifted but deprived by age, birth, and other conditional nastiness. The most egregious example of the Zerot’s early feudal dictate is the ignoring of the Prophet Muhammad by the tribal elite of the Quraysh. But to rise above all the Zerots — early feudal proud people need glory; they need exploits (because glory and exploits are an early feudal ideology, the empire also needs seizures so that all underdeveloped barbarian peoples work for the empire). Therefore, the Zerots are proud, and we are talking about those who got rid of the envy of the «brothers» of the community — from the jealousy of the people, they went to war and seized neighboring territories. Do you understand it? Barbarian savages attacked from hunger to feed their people and their brothers, and the feudal lords of Zerots went to conquest for the sake of the imperial idea, that is, from satiety (nothing has changed in 5000 years) and for glory. This is the perpetuum mobile of imperial existence. Every emperor knew that if you sat quietly, the people would decay by themselves.

So that the people do not rot, you need to hit strangers so your own are afraid.

The elites fought with each other and sometimes slaughtered rival clans no worse than barbarians. They also marched against their neighbors according to the laws of the empire. It is a double-edged sword. It is necessary to win, it is impossible to lose, trophies and lands had to be distributed to their people, and to gain glory for themselves. Following this golden rule, Byzantium and Sasanian Iran (the Second Persian Empire) fought each other tirelessly. For 400 years, there was an organized fight, and the war went on with varying success.