электронная
360
печатная A5
426
18+
New chemistry and astrophysics – 2021

Бесплатный фрагмент - New chemistry and astrophysics – 2021


Объем:
110 стр.
Возрастное ограничение:
18+
ISBN:
978-5-0055-2298-6
электронная
от 360
печатная A5
от 426

18+

Книга предназначена
для читателей старше 18 лет

Autor Jeordie Vic Meier

All information in this book is my intellectual property. And I will find out and punish whoever tries to appropriate it. This book was sent to several scientific centers and in Nobel committee.

I have files proving that I am the author of this book even before I sent it to someone.

1. Atom. New Chemistry.

2. New chemistry table.

3. Structure of cosmos. Astrophysics.

4. Chemistry and living organism.

— Atom. New Chemistry.

Be patient, I tried to write so that the structure of atom was formed into a single structure.

My book is better, more correct and more logical than any chemistry textbook, I found all mistakes of modern theoretical chemistry.

Scientists have come to conclusion that proton and neutron of all chemicals are composed of two types of quarks.

Quarks: u quark (or up quark); d-quark (or down quark);

Also, scientists came to conclusion that there are more neutrons in atom than protons.

..but nevertheless, scientists at the hadron collider discovered about 5 new quarks, where did they come from and what is it?

Scientists have not described how these quarks are related to each other, the principle of their energy exchange so that they do not fall apart. One quark in proton in the middle should be conductor of energy between two other quarks, it should be special, like magnet, if proton consists of «u, u, d» quarks, then conductor is «d» quark, if neutron consists of «u, d, d» quarks, then conductor is «u» quark, this is very strange. I am sure that results of scientists’ research are wrong, if I studied them in more detail or had opportunity to be present at experiment, then I would point out to them their error.

When scientists split atom, it decays into hadrons, a trio of quarks that stick together, so that quarks do not scatter, there must be energy exchange, need to understand the principle of energy exchange between quarks, as well as nature of each quark separately. If there are only 2 types of quarks in hadron, then system of hadron consisting of 3 quarks will not work. A trio of quarks consisting of 2 types of quarks is impossible.

In fact, proton is made up of 3 different quarks, just like neutron.

Here is my theory and its proof.

When scientists destroy atom, it is divided into androns, which consist of three quarks, which means that these three quarks have special energy connection.

If we reason logically of what matter consists adron is:

— Quark are fragments from exploding stars, these fragments look like pieces of metal.

2. Quark is piece of metal energy conductor magnet, if hadron consisted of only two types of quarks then atom would not have formed.

3. Quark- that was formed when stars explosion.

1.This silver metallic quark consists of particles of chaos and ideal particles (to find out its physical properties), let’s reason logically.

There are chaos particles in this quark, chaotically moving destructive particles, if they were not there and this quark was an ideal conductor of energy then atoms and stars from which it broke off would not collapse, all physical matter has particles of chaos in it that destroy it. In this world every thing decomposes and collapses over time, imagine if matter consisted of ideal particles that formed harmonious energy connection, they would not lose energy, plus eternal energy supply from electron, it lives as long as the galaxy lives, then these stars would not die, but lived as long how long the galaxy lives.

Ideal particles consist of orderly dancing mini-particles, they receive, store and conduct energy.

Space is divided into ideal particles, they glow, give and conduct energy to chaos particles, chaos particles it’s small chaotically moving particles, they destroy.

And there are also particles that consist of ideal particles and particles of chaos, they appeared after the death of first stars. Possible first stars were arranged differently than modern stars. So, logically, it turns out that this quark consists of normal ideal particle that conducts energy and of chaos particles. If this quark consisted only of ideal initial particles that conduct energy, then all chemical elements would be charged with energy so strongly that they could not be taken in hand, they would radiate strong, and if we ourselves consist of atoms, then we would glow and themselves would besource of energy. I am sure that scientists have already split the quark, which proves that it consists of smaller particles and this is particle of chaos and perfect particle.

In short, the 1 quark consists of chaos particles and ideal particles that transfer and store energy, but chaos particles are also slightly charged with energy

— Quark electrical conductor magnet. Well, quarks must somehow be connected with each other and this is force that holds them together when atom decays into hadrons, this quark provides good connection between two other quarks. Аtom is destroyed due to the fact that high temperature, pressure and other external influences disrupt the energy connection between quarks, this quark conductor loses energy and hadron gets damaged.

Although new atoms are born when the old atom has a lot of energy due to falling into special external conditions. I think this is perfect quark without chaos particles, because it conducts energy best.

3. Third quark, which possible looks like black piece, part of explosion of stars.

Now I have to prove it.

Let’s analyze situation if hadron consisted of 2 types of quarks as scientists write.

1. Proton: Quark -conductor of energy and 2 metallic identical quarks. Then neutron will consist of 2 quarks of energy conductors and one metallic one. (u, d, u) (d, u, d) Funny huh?

Perhaps protons and neutrons differ from each other not by the presence of electron in it, but by quark composition, I do not believe that atom consists of only 3 types of quarks, there should be more of them.

Scientists saw only 2 types of quarks. They may have lost third.

In short, atom has such properties, it conducts energy, which means it has ideal particles, it is not eternal, it lives no longer than galaxy, in its quarks there are particles of chaos that destroy matter (chaotically moving dark particles) if they were not there, then all matter around shone as if she was struck by lightning and this atom and matter would be eternal.

In chemical elements, in addition to light quarks of which the hydrogen atom consists, also particles of stardust (solar and cosmic particles), they have a different radiation and they affect the human body in a different way. Аn example of heavy and radioactive chemicals, there are such particles that are not in light chemical elements, so when they enter the body it is so difficult to remove them (mercury and radiation). When these particles fall on the earth, they can change, they exchange energy with other particles, they can deforms and change their radiation, this gives rise to wide variety of different particles that make up chemical elements. Also due to the particles of stardust, which are heavier than hydrogen, heavier atoms are formed, the atom needs a nucleus with a strong attraction. In short, in the nucleus of heavy atom there are particles that are not in hydrogen.

So here are components of which atoms are composed: quarks, photons (they are not in all atoms, they give or take energy from atom), stardust (heavier particles than quarks from hydrogen), electrons and unknown substances- gluons, also in atoms there is particle unique only for this galaxy — «Galaxion», I theoretically prove its existence.

«Galaxions» are, in a sense, piece of soul of galaxy, in different galaxies are different «Galaxions», thanks to «Galaxion», galaxies do not merge into one large galaxy, if this particle were not there, then there would not be different galaxies, but there would be one large galaxy around the center of the universe. You can understand the role of «Galaxion» in more detail in the section where I will describe how galaxies and universe are born.

«Galaxion» is one of the first-born particles of galaxy, something like soul of galaxy.

Atoms and stars outside the galaxy are not born, which means that for their birth they need charge, some kind of special particle, I call it «Galaxion».

So I refuted theory that at very beginning cosmos consisted of quarks, in fact, quarks were born later from smaller particles.

Let’s go back to structure of atom

Gluons are formed during the decay of atom and immediately disappear, they do not disappear, they fly away.

Scientists should not try to catch gluons and split them, because this is part of body of universe, like its soul, if you destroy small piece of universe, it can lead to destruction of all life in space, like chain reaction.

Why scientists did not see this particle «Galaxion», perhaps they saw, but did not understand what is it or took it for electron.

If we analyze the nature of electron, then my logic builds such constructions. In different galaxies there are different particles" Galaxions», but they have something common, which means they consist of smaller particles. Аll galaxies have different electrons, they have different radiation, but electrons have something in common, this particle" Godeye».

If you think that I could not prove the existence of «Galaxion» particle, then here is the list of evidence.

1. In the center of galaxy there is substance that holds the gravity of stars around it, the core of star consists of heavy atom and particles of stardust, which means that the center of the galaxy also consists of heavy particles of stardust.

Logically, in all galaxies the core consists of the similar particles of stardust. We found out that these stardust are attracted to each other, forming a nucleus, then the centers of all galaxies should be attracted to each other, but no, there is some force that creates different points of attraction in cosmos around wich stardust gather to form the nucleus of galaxy. These points of attraction have different radiation, they have particles that are different from each other, but have a common property, they have an energy charge. I call these particles «Galaxions».

«Galaxions» as atoms have different structures and radiation, but they have a common microparticle in their composition, which attracts other particles to itself in different proportions, thus different types of «Galaxions» are formed.

..Yes, this is new information and it is difficult to accept it, but I am sure that none of scientists will ever create more logical theory.

— — —

*So calculating number of electrons, protons, neutrons in an atom according to the old system of Mendeleev will be erroneous, just like calculating the masses of protons and neutrons, especially since the periodic table of Mendeleev is one continuous error, there are very few real pure substances with full-fledged atoms, there is substances with defective atoms and different particles of stardust, or chemicals has not atoms at all.

This is what I found in a chemistry textbook. (How much magnesium and how many magnesium atoms are contained in a sample of pure magnesium weighing 6 grams? What is the mass of one magnesium atom?) Why torment the brain of people with this nonsense. Magnesium does not consist entirely of atoms, but you will never calculate the mass of atoms that are in it, because chemical elements are living structures and the number of atoms in them can change, they lose energy over time and turn into quarkrubbish.

You should not rely on periodic table of Mendeleev, it is not correct, not all elements in it are separate chemical elements, scientists have not yet learned how to fully separate pure atoms from matter.

What is full-fledged atom.

This is a stable atom, and not those mutants that scientists get in their laboratories and that live for 20 seconds, an example of atom Nichunium. Perhaps he live not for 20 seconds, but he simply fell and disappeared from the field of view and later collapsed in a couple of hours, because he did not have enough energy due to absence of some element in him. Or he has defect in structure of its quarks, and this destroyed the entire chain. In any case, structure living for 20 seconds is not atom. Need to learn distinguish normal atom from defective one by vibrations that it emits, normal one has stable vibration, and inferior atom emits chaotic waves, like radiation.

This is a fake, they failed to create atom, atom is stable unit, it does not decay by itself within 20 seconds like Japanese Nihunium, they collided Zinc with 30 protons and Bismuth with 83 protons (we already found out that number of protons in chemical elements in periodic table is wrong), as result, they attributed 113 electrons and protons to Nichunium. This is genius. Firstly, no one has ever counted the exact number of protons and electrons of Zinc and Bismuth in microscope, this is speculative data, so there are definitely not 113 electrons in this under-atom of Nichunium, and secondly, they did not take into account the sterility of container in which they cooked their soup of atoms, for sure there were particles from previous experiments: atoms of oxygen, hydrogen, plus reaction with material of which their container made, plus i don’t think that Bismuth consists of full-fledged atoms, there are no full-fledged atoms with nucleus- center that is filled with energy and creates an attraction.

Scientists who create new atoms in their laboratories openly say that their atoms are destroyed after a while, lose energy. Вut why then no one says that atoms in the matter around us can also be destroyed due to energy loss and turn into quark mass. And thus, chemical elements are not made entirely of atoms.

Chemists say that all chemical elements consist of the same particles, supposedly they differ only in their internal ststructure. But this is not so, different chemical elements consist of different particles, in lead there are particles that are not in oxygen.

And how did the ancient scientists arrange the elements in the periodic table of Mendeleev? They weighed all substances they discovered, calculated their estimated atomic weight, and arranged them in ascending order by weight.

Now imagine in what conditions this happened, these scientists were half-crazy disabled, because most likely they did not use any means of protection in working with toxic substances (mercury, lead, and so on), these substances poison the body and destroy nervous system, people go crazy with these substances, and now half-mad scientist takes substance not completely purified from foreign impurities and weighs it.

Plus on earth and most likely in this galaxy not all chemicals are present in the order 1,2,3,4,5,6,7.. electrons in atom, many atoms are not on the planet, they are either too precious or too dangerous. So new chemical periodic table will have empty cells that we will never fill. The set of atoms on the planet is, in sense, an accident.

Need also carefully study and describe each chemical element of periodic table, what it really is. It is necessary to remove from table of Mendeleev the molecular weight of elements and numbers that indicate the quantity of electrons. Mendeleev’s table will become just a list of chemicals with which people deals.

Also need to remove the valence and numbers of electrons from chemical equations and tasks.

How can we talk about the valence of atom if not all substances in the periodic table consist of full-fledged homogeneous atoms, plus scientists do not know exactly how many electrons there are.

Now I understand why at school I didn’t want to solve these equations and didn’t even want to look at them.

Theoretical chemistry with equations and tasks where you need to arrange valences and electrons, this is all wrong, because elements in periodic table of Mendeleev are either defective damaged atoms or chaos from quarks and stardust, scientists do not know which ones of chemical elements are pure and how many electrons they actually have. They cannot describe what actually happens with chemicals when they are mixed. Need to create new education system in order to describe in detail processes that occur with chemicals in every chemical reaction.

Scientists are busy creating new atoms in laboratory, but they have not even studied the usual chemical elements, they do not know exactly how many electrons and hadrons are there, scientists are not even learned to isolate pure substance consisting of homogeneous atoms.

Great attention must be paid to safety of scientists, because many chemicals in their pure form are hazardous to health.

So chemistry will partly remain theoretical science, but I think people don’t really need pure substances consist of homogene atoms, we already have everything materials need for life.

Whole section of chemistry on chemical compounds is devoted to the theory that atoms attract to each other with help of electrons and thus form chemical bonds, in fact, full-fledged atoms at first will fight, they are irritated by presence of each other, they interfere with each other, because they can destroy each other, which happens over time, the heavier atom takes energy from other atom and this other atom is destroyed, loses electrons, and stronger atom, thanks to it, prolongs its life.

Atoms attract and hold each other not by electrons, but by the attraction of their energy centers. Normal atom has bright energy center with stable radiation.

Method of studying chemicals. Take a pea-sized plate of chemical substance and with the help of some kind of detector device (I think there are such devices in centers where the atom is studied) determine how much piece luminous points there (these are the energy centers of atoms) so scientists will understand how many atoms in different chemicals. Presence of glowing energy center means that there is an atom.

This atom has its own radiation.

*It seems to me that such topic as transformation of one chemical element into another more valuable one with other chemical properties has great potential. ..for example, we take meta, we need to change its energy charge by adding some chemical in this metal (carbon?), and then metal under photon emitter or under electricity for a different amount of time and check what will happen in 10 hours, in 20, 30 or 80 hours, a week, then metal will be saturated with energy and with the help of quark rubbish that is in almost any piece of material, the metal will become another more valuable chemical element by attaching new electrons. We can add quark rubbish and stardust from other substances so that metal can take hadrons from there for its transformation.

I cannot yet accurately predict the result of these experiments, but in any case, people can convert not very valuable chemical elements of which they have a lot into more valuable materials.

*Here is false theory of chemists. «Electrons pressed into core of atom and merge with protons there. From the fusion of electron with proton, a neutron is obtained? This is how neutron stars are formed.»

Еlectron is not quark so that neutron could’t be obtained from its merger with proton.

We know that neutron does not have electron, neutron is like an anchor for atom. Neutron is a set of quarks, it contains quark that is not present in proton, a heavier quark.

What is a full-fledged atom, it is a complete formed atom in which there are enough quarks, it does not have excess energy to which additional neutrons can join, all its energy is used, it is an energy system. There are atoms that lack quarks and they at the stage of formation.

*Hadron collider.

It would be interesting for me to work there and understand the meaning of their experiments of, they themselves do not fully understand what they are doing with body of galaxy (microparticles is body of galaxy), I would help them understand it. Although I think that they all mutated there a long time ago due to micro particles that are formed in the course of their experiments and one employees dies there regularly.

2.New chemistry table.

Introduction, for describing the structure of chemicals, I will use such word as stardust. These are fragments of stars of varying degrees of energy charge of which chemicals are composed, in addition to quarks, of which hadrons are composed. This stardust is part of the cosmic and solar radiation falling on the earth, some of which scientists have already studied. But it is an indisputable fact that the matter around consists not only of hadrons, just the scientists — chemists have forgotten about it.

This stardust has different properties, it creates attraction around which the nucleus of the atom is formed, it creates gravity and the attraction of materials. Protons and neutrons of hydrogen can’t do that.

These particles can attract electrons, take and give up energy.

* Determination of protons and neutrons.

Only the lightest pieces of stardust are combined into hadrons. Take the example of hydrogen atom as an elementary hadron. And in order for these hadrons to unite to create a more complex atom, they need an energy-charged stellar particle that is heavier than ordinary quark, which will be located in the center of atom as center of energy attraction, it must be stronger than quark in order to be able to concentrate the energy of the nucleus in itself and keeping its integrity. The heavier the atom, the more stardust in its core.

Using the hydrogen atom as an example, we see that the maximum number of hadrons that can unite into the nucleus of an atom is 3 hadrons.

Scientists have discovered many particles that are part of cosmic radiation, of course, these particles are part of chemicals, which, according to scientists, consists only of protons and neutrons. I call these particles stardust, they differ in physical properties from the quarks that make up the proton and neutron of hydrogen.

Alpha, beta, gamma particles, various anti particles, bosons, photons. Plus particles of stardust are deformed on the earth as a result of energy exchange with each other, they can lose their energy charge and their properties change.

Scientists assume that alpha particles are helium nuclei, but wait, is helium dangerous to health? because alpha particles are dangerous, or is it some kind of special type of helium. Ordinary hadrons cannot harm the body, they are too light, particles of stardust, which are also part of the chemical substances, is harm to man.

These particles damage structure of the cell, they attract energy or other particles in the body, disrupting the functioning of organs.

Alpha particles are not helium nuclei, these are particles of stardust, perhaps it separated from the helium atom, because in addition to hadrons in helium there are particles of stardust, in all atoms except hydrogen they are, they are needed to attract hadrons particles to themselves and create a more complex atom. It’s needed so that hadrons can be attracted to each other and create something more complicated than hydrogen.

Betta particles, according to scientists, are electrons or positrons. What? Who believed that electrons can strong harm to the body, new electrons constantly enter us and we are alive.

I had the opportunity to touch the weakly radioactive substances that emit alpha and beta particles, I wrote that due to my weak immunity, I have a high sensitivity to chemicals, I feel their radiation and how they affect me, so I feel alpha particles as charged energy of needle, from them a state of tingling in the hand. And Beta particles are like heavy nuclei that pierce the tissue of the body and take energy. And these are definitely not helium nuclei or electrons with positrons. I can sense radiation and distinguish its types.

With radioactive radiation or an explosion, matter decays.

Man will not die if free protons, neutrons and electrons enter his body, this is normal, they are building blocks for the matter of our body, they are too light to harm us.

Proof that there are other particles in matter besides quarks that make up the proton and neutron. There are heavy metals that, when entering our body, cause it severe harm, for example, mercury, if it consisted only of protons and neutrons, it would not cause severe harm to the body, heavy particles of stardust are dangerous, which, like radiation, harm the body and are hardly washed out of the body.

Another example is the chemical formula of ethyl alcohol С2Н5ОН, I think that this is a mistake, if alcohol consisted only of these substances, it would be harmless. Alcohol undoubtedly contains heavy particles of stardust. In chemistry, many chemical formulas of substances are not correct.

*Scientists are obsessed with creating new types of atoms, but an atom is a random structure, it is unstable, it gains and loses energy in material, depending on what types of stardust particles are contained in the material. It is foolish to count the number of hadrons if the atoms are unstable. And there are no atoms with 7,8,9,10 … 100 protons in the chemical table, we were taught this for years in chemistry lessons, but all in vain. It is necessary to delete from theoretical chemistry such section as false information about the structure of atom, about the number of its hadrons, about the arrangement of its electrons, this is all a lie. There are almost no materials on earth that have atomic structure, that is, they are completely composed only of atoms, except for elementary gases.

* In the matter in which there are defective atoms, there may be such phenomenon as the presence of defective atoms of different structure. Atom consists of many different particles, and it would be surprising if defective atoms forming or decaying were absolutely identical in composition.

*This is what scientists have to do, they have to calculate the density of substance, if materials were composed only of atoms. For example, we count the number of electrons in hydrogen and calculate its density, then we count the number of electrons in nitrogen and oxygen and calculate the density of these materials, so we understand how much the force of attraction of the nucleus of atom increases with increase the number of electrons in it. Then scientists calculate the force of attraction of nucleus of atom of other substances with different numbers of electrons, and thus we calculate the density of these not yet created substances (because in chemistry there are almost no substances consisting only of atoms). And I will tell you that substance consisting of atoms with 15 electrons should be soft almost like mercury. That is, the more electrons, the stronger the gravitational force of nucleus and the denser structure of substance, which means that soft but heavy chemical elements in the chemical table after number 20 do not exactly consist entirely of atoms, they are consist of few atoms and stardust.

Do you understand that lithium number 3 cannot be composed of atoms with 3 electrons? Lithium is a solid material.

*Making material composed of atoms is more difficult process than surgery. I think it’s as difficult as DNA modeling. First create or resurrect atoms in material by saturating it with energy, and then separating the atoms in material from other particles of stardust, need to melt it and need a magnetic plate made of a special material to which atoms will be attracted, creating a layer of material consisting only from atoms. Possible to use some kind of acids in this process.

* By the way, living micro and macro organisms also affect the life of atoms, they consume substances in one form, partially modify them and secrete other substances. For example, worms parasites eat valuable substances, but they emit harmful substances, they simply take energy from these substances (atoms).

*So we came to conclusion that chemical elements do not consist entirely of atoms, in many elements there are very few of these atoms, but scientists have learned to determine the chemical composition and presence of certain elements in materials using special devices, this is means that these devices determine not radiation of atoms, but the special radiation of stardust particles that make up the material. Although if materials consisted entirely of atoms, then their radiation would be different too.

Need to make an experiment, take several metals in the same proportion, then melt them together and use an electronic device to measure the ratio of metals in this alloy, whether it will be the same as in the beginning, for example, 25% silver, 25% nickel, 25%copper, 25% iron, etc. then subject this alloy to various influences, for example, prolonged exposure to an electric current, a week, 2 weeks, a month, for example, and then again scan the chemical composition of alloy with this electronic device, I think it will be different because some of particles that make up the alloy will change their radiation and possibly new atoms will be born in the alloy.

And I’m also wondering if you mix 10 or 20 different metals in equal proportions, then the metal analyzer will give the result that this alloy has an equal amount of these metals or not?

I want to study in detail the metal analyzer device, I generally understand the principle of its operation and it seems to me that I can improve it if use a different material as a magnetic plate (it seems to use silicon there now) it will increase accuracy of readings.

It works according to the following principle: the laser fills the upper layer of studying material with energy and particles fly off from this material and fall on the plate, which measures their radiation and determines which chemical element they belong to. Conclusion, each chemical element has its own especially charged particles or a cluster of particles that have their own special radiation. This device measures not the radiation of atoms that make up the material, but the radiation of stardust particles of which it is composed. Because materials are not made entirely of atoms. Particles or clusters of particles that this device measures may not have a nucleus around which electrons revolve, which means it is not atom.

Just recently I got the idea to create an apparatus that will analyze the composition of blood for heavy metals, it will have a magnetic plate that will attract only heavy particles, and light particles that do not harm the body will not attract. It will differ from metal analyzer, it will not have laser emitter that would burn blood. This device will be installed in every hospital and will conduct an instant scan of person’s blood, because a person’s poor health in 80% of cases is associated with the presence of poisons in his blood.

I think I could create this apparatus with other scientists. Although there are already other devices that analyze chemicals in the blood.

*About electrical conductivity. The electrical conductivity of material depends on the number of photons in it and on the state and physical properties of particles that make up the material.

The role that electrons play in the electrical conductivity of material. Electron receives energy and transfers it to particle with which it is connected, this particle transfers energy to another electron, and so on along the chain. If there were no electrons, the particles would explode, they would not be able to transfer energy. That is, the electrical conductivity of material depends on the number of photons and electrons in it.

The fact that some materials conduct electricity well, while others do not, speaks not of a different atomic structure, this is not the reason, but reason is in the fact that different particles of stardust with different properties are present in different chemical elements.

The melting point of substance with dense atomic structure can be maximum 1400 degrees.

There is table of conductivity of materials so you can compare them. This information helps in understanding the structure of a chemical element.

https://tehtab.ru/Guide/GuidePhysics/ElectricityAndMagnethism/ElectricalResistanceAndConductivity/ElResMics/

I give a short description of chemicals, in which I argue that they are not composed entirely of atoms.

I can give more detailed description of each chemical, describe the properties of the particles of which it is composed, their interaction with each other and their reaction to electric current, sunlight and other external influences, but now I’m tired, it would take me 6 months, but so far there is no response to my work and I do not know whether someone needs it and whether people are ready to accept this information, first they must accept the fact that all chemical elements do not consist of the same quarks that make up hydrogen, and chemical elements do not consist entirely of atoms, I do not want to waste my time on this, I have already spent a whole year on this book, this time I could devote to my other hobbies and they would bring me profit.

I know that if a global catastrophe does not occur in the civilized world, then theoretical chemistry will change and scientists will look at chemistry as I see, sooner or later they will accept my information and I would like it to happen while I am alive, and not after my death someone would have appropriated my knowledge and research for themselves and I would go down in history as Giordano Bruno who born at the stake for true knowledge about the world that the world was not yet ready to accept or Van Gogh who became popular after his death.

* in heavy chemical elements the percentage of particles that make up light chemicals such as hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen is no more than 50%, the rest substance is other particles of stardust.

If I analyze the elements by what particles they contain, then it should be done this way, there are several types of energy, solar, electric and one more type. Particles differ in size, according to how they react to different type of energy, what energy they themselves contain, how much of this energy in them. In short, how the material and particles in it react to the sun and electricity, as well as their effect on a living cell.

— Helium.

Helium atom is formed when hydrogen atom has additional energy to attach new hadrons to itself.

There must also be helium, which was formed as a result of destruction of the oxygen atom in the sun. I suppose that this deformed atom is dangerous for humans because it has little energy, it is in the upper layer of atmosphere because helium is lighter than oxygen and protects us from solar radiation. But it has a number of hadrons similar to normal helium.

There is little helium in the sun, and contrary to the data of scientists, there is more than 1% oxygen there. If the sun were made of helium, it would burn out much faster.

Scientists think radioactive Alpha particles are helium nuclei, but no, they are different things. What do you need to do with the helium in children’s balloons to make it radioactive? ..is this helium supposed to lose electrons? Have scientists ever managed to turn helium into dangerous radioactive Alpha particles?

You should not trust the official conclusions of scientists, after I studied all theoretical chemistry and chemical elements, I came to conclusion that scientists were engaged in inventing some facts and using their high status forced the rest world to accept their version.

3. Lithium

(Lightweight, weak internal attraction, soft, burns when heated. Melting point 180 degrees.)

Lithium has the ability to absorb gases such as oxygen and hydrogen, it contains a lot of energy, but there is no lithium atom, if lithium had an atomic structure, then its atoms would repel foreign atoms from themselves, lithium would not have such ability as the absorption of other chemical elements.

If lithium consisted of atoms with 3 electrons, then it would not be so solid, the attraction of atoms is too weak.

Different chemicals contain many different cosmic particles in different proportions and varying degrees of energy charge, this determines the physical and chemical properties of the material.

4. Beryllium.

(Melting point 1280 degrees. Hard, but brittle. Does not burn if heated. Dissolves in acids, toxic, beryllium powder is self-ignites. Good conductor of electricity.)

Just like lithium, beryllium is too hard, it cannot be made up of atoms with 4 electrons.

Toxicity is a sign of absence or small number of photons and the fact that beryllium is not a full-fledged atom with an odd number of electrons.

So Beryllium consists of stardust, a small number of defective atoms, hadrons and a few photons.

5. Boron

(Solid, high capture of thermal neutrons, dissolves in acids, melting point 2070 degrees)

Boron is a hungry substance, so it attracts what scientists call thermal neutrons, boron needs energy, which means that its particles have a small charge of energy.

Boron does not have dense atomic structure, his temperature of melting is too high.

Boron consist of few atoms and stardust.

Brown boron powder has less energy than black boron.

6. Carbon

A mysterious element, it has many modifications, if it consisted of the same atoms, then it would not be able to take on so many different forms with different physical properties. Why other chemical elements cannot do this?

All types of carbon are light atoms of substances such as nitrogen and hydrogen, the rest is sun dust of varying degrees of energy charge.

7. Nitrogen.

Essential for the body.

Аtom with odd number of electrons and photon. Nitrogen has a lot of energy.

8. Oxygen.

This is atom that lacks energy, so it attaches itself to almost all substances.

It have photon.

9. Fluorine.

(Has a gas structure. Toxic.)

But my guess it is pieces of stardust possibly attached to damaged oxygen or nitrogen atom. Fluorine is not atom, 9 electrons not rotate around pieses of Fluorine.

Fluorine ignites many substances, including water, but atom of gas cannot be such strong oxidizing agent.

Fluorine attracts particles of other substances and when it becomes too much energy it ignites.

The body does not need it and the fact that it is found in the teeth does not mean that the teeth need it, any tissue contains decay products and wastes, fluoride in toothpaste may play the role of preservative and destroyer of bacteria, but certainly not a tooth hardener.

10. Neon.

Neon atoms take in electricity, which means they have stardust particles that are not in oxygen.

This means that the quark composition of neon is not identical to the quark composition of gases such as oxygen, nitrogen and hydrogen.

11. Sodium.

(Melting point 100 degrees. Soft, soluble in water, self-igniting. Good conductor of electricity)

This is not atom, but a set of hadrons, stardust and light atoms. Sodium contains a lot of photons and solar energy, so it is useful for human body.

Sodium does not have a dense atomic structure, there are not many atoms in it, because it is easily self-igniting, let’s take the example of oxygen, nitrogen and hydrogen, these substances have atoms and dense atomic structure, but they do not ignite from each other.

If sodium was composed of atoms with 11 electrons, it would be liquid like mercury.

Sodium is oxidized in air because oxygen takes part of the energy from sodium, and burns in water because hydrogen and oxygen atoms attack the energy structure of sodium with their electrons and begin the process of energy release.

12. Magnesium.

(Explodes and burns from water,

dissolves in acids, conducts electricity,

powder burns when heated, good for health. Melting point 650 degrees)

This means that there are a lot of photons. It is also obvious fact that magnesium has a weak internal structure, otherwise it would not burn, but melt when heated.

Мagnesium, contains particles of stardust, photons and little atoms.

13. Aluminum.

(Melting point is 660 degrees. Good electrical conductor, toxic.)

Aluminum is toxic to the body, it takes energy from the cell, but nevertheless, aluminum is used to make utensils for cooking.

Aluminum is too hard for a material that scientists believe consists of atoms with 13 electrons, if that were so, it would be soft as chewing gum.

.. Aluminum enters into chemical reaction with almost all substances, it is not found in its pure form, which means that aluminum is need something and it is trying to take it from other materials.

Of course, atoms in aluminum occupy only a small part of material, in the periodic table there are no materials entirely consisting of atoms, people have not yet learned how to create such materials.

14. Silicon.

(Melting point 1400 degrees. Used in lighters, solar panels, bad conducts energy, but good for the body.)

Silicon, when exposed to sunlight, gives off energy and weakens, if silicon received energy from the sun, then the work life of solar cells would be unlimited.

This is the principle of energy production, need to destroy matter in order to extract energy from it.

Silicon gives energy to the sun and is destroyed, this leads to the release of electrical energy. It seems to me that there are several types of energy in matter and in the energy exchange between the earth and sun. The energy that plants consume; waste energy from solar radiation; electrical energy, its source is space; the energy that sun takes from the earth. Need to study them. We also need to study silicon solar panels, what happens when the sun’s rays fall on the panel, what particles silicon loses and what particles enter it.

Energy exchange between the Earth and Sun. Waste from the sun comes to earth. Also, other particles charged with energy fly to the earth from cosmos. The sun takes some of energy from the earth like a vampire.

Silicon does not have a dense atomic structure, there are few or no atoms in it, because the material consisting of atoms will not be destroyed by sunlight.

15. Phosphorus.

(Melting point 44 degrees. Toxic. It conducts energy bad, white phosphorus ignites spontaneously, and red is used to make matches.)

Under normal conditions, phosphorus takes energy from oxygen, when the temperature rises above 40 degrees, phosphorus gives up energy and because of this its integrity is violated and it ignites.

Phosphorus does not have a dense atomic structure, but it has a lot of energy and may contain a small number of atoms. Phosphorus it’s little atoms and stardust.

16. Sulfur.

(not conduct electricity, is toxic, melting point 110 degrees)

In a piece of sulfur there are very few full-fledged atoms, mainly sulfur consists of destroyed atoms. It’s not normal that chemical starts to evaporate if you set it on fire. The high temperature easily breaks down the internal structure of sulfur and the particles of sulfur get energy and attached to oxygen atoms. The toxicity of sulfur is due to the presence of harmful particles of stardust in it, they have little energy, therefore, getting into the body, they take energy from atoms of the cell and man experiences a feeling of cold, it is hard for him to breathe. These are my subjective sensations from sulfur poisoning.

Sulfur have little photons (her toxic) and little electrons (bad conductor of electricity)

I don’t know why scientists believe that sulfur is good for the human body, perhaps some kind of sulfur, its compound is good for humans, but as a rule, sulfur is a poison.

17. Chlorine.

(Melting point 100 degrees, do not conduct electricity)

Chlorine is not a chemical element made up of atoms of the same type. If chlorine consisted of atoms with 17 electrons, then it would be harder.

Сhlorine is after aluminum, but for some reason it flies. Chlorine is, semi-discharged stardust attached to more airy elements like hydrogen or oxygen.

18. Argon.

I’m not sure if this is a separate chemical element. Scientists need to analyze the process of producing argon again in order to understand its nature; scientists receive it under conditions of exposure to oxygen and nitrogen with electric voltage and low temperatures. Perhaps they damage and modify oxygen atoms and they attract particles of stardust due to which argon glows from an electric current.

Scientists need to try to extract oxygen from argon. In nature, there is no such gas argon, and if it is formed somewhere where the temperature is below -180° degrees, then it does not live long. And another question is, what happens to argon when it is released into an open environment, it remains in the same state or is modified, argon decomposes on oxygen, which proves my theory that argon does not have its own atoms. let scientists try to conduct an experiment, add 5—10% oxygen to argon, check if it glows from electricity, and then check the state of argon every other day, week and month. Argon atoms must decompose and there will be no glow.

19. Potassium.

(Not toxic, electrical conductor, melting point 60 degrees,

unstable, oxidizes and explodes in water)

If potassium consisted of atoms, then these atoms would be stronger than water atoms (H2O) and there would be no explosion.

Бесплатный фрагмент закончился.
Купите книгу, чтобы продолжить чтение.
электронная
от 360
печатная A5
от 426